kyle said:
that's so great of you isysy...
i made an affidavit myself...
but i also want you to comment on it...
THE AFFIDAVIT FROM THAT AGENCY (LATER KO NALANG IMEMENTION)... IS TYPED HERE IN THE FORUM WORD FOR WORD...
NOT EDITED... AND FOR PETE'S SAKE!!! IT'S ONLY NOW I NOTICED MALI MALI PA PALA YUNG NAME NA NILAGAY NILA NG EMPLOYER KO...
SO IT'S ALL PIG'S WORK!!! HAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY... (deep breath...
)
i'll PM you my email add...
ll send you all documents i scanned here, so you can have a basis...
pls do help
wait ko please email mo sakin so i'll now where to send.
thank you! sssssssooooooooooooooo much!!!
kyle, here's the review:
note: i-tago natin as alias "MXXXXal" yung hospital mo para di ma google, okay?
Q: what is your contractual date with the MXXXXal city? dates of employment to be specific
Q: does it overlap your work as a private duty nurse?
I now understand that it is the practice of the MXXXXal City to recommend staff nurses as a private nurse to their patients.
Q: do you have an employment contact with the MXXXXal city explicitly indicating that you CAN do private work on their patients? OR if your employee contract did NOT specify anything in this nature (non declaration of this in your contract means that this is not restricted) or is this practice, from a word of mouth lang talaga, from your patient/friend/supervisor na "okay lang yan - ako bahala" ?
Check with MXXXXal city's best person at their HR (for nurses) and inquire if they do have any regulation whatsoever duly written in the employment contract that you've signed when you signed up with MXXXXal city that FORBIDS you to do private duty work for their patients?
Q: did you submit the employment contract to the embassy ba?
If there is... then we have to strengthen your affidavit... if I am a VO, this for me is why it is considered "fraudulent" ...
Here's my theory:
everyone knows that a reputable institution SHOULD protect their rights and forbid employees from engaging into business with their partners/competition/constituent/patients... a.k.a the "non-compete agreement". right guys??? the fraudulent part is that you (at the eyes of the VO) made a breach of contract with the MXXXXal City - with the assumption that they have a non-compete agreement.
Q: Do you remember ever signing this kind of agreement or contract? (call your friends at the MXXXXal city after you read this post)
I don't think this is due to the use of the letter head. I think partially, overlapping of work (if you did) and most importantly "WHY" did you work as private nurse while you were still a staff nurse of the same hospital at the same time. that's not logically legal for them, not even for me... but I am not within any reach of the medical industry, so I don't know about this practice. But so as FES...
Im just being honest with my opinion here coz I am really looking at all the possible angles as to why they've considered this fraudulent - and here is a big possibility. when I first read your post, my reaction talaga was "really??? pwede pala yun? mag sideline ka sa loob pa ng hospital?"
(personal opinion ko to ha) if a job is considered "full-time" wala nang pwedeng "part-time". pwede kang part-time dito and part-time doon, but not full-time+part-time. "FULL" na nga eh, diba?
If you can get hold of the best person in the HR (staff nurse dept) of the MXXXXal City soon and ask them something .... if that manager in your HR was already at that position while you working at the MXXXXal City and with your private duty sideline - baka (sana lang) it would help a lot if you can get a "back-dated" (sorry guys!)
letter of recommendation from the MXXXXal City to the daughter of your patient indicating that you are recommended to do business with that person for an indefinite period as a private nurse while working at the hospital and that you will be connected to that patient as a private duty nurse and the hospital is not affiliated with that engagement and is free from the responsibilities with the compensation and benefits resulting to that recommended work. If you work as the private duty nurse after the being a staff nurse sa hospital, pwede din... mas straight-forward na recommendation letter.
palabas natin that it is THE HOSPITAL that made you a private nurse for your patient... parang naging 'special case' and approved by a duly authorized person with a recommendation.
actually the hard part here is how to convience the VO that you just have access to this letter. in your affidavit, let's add that you have retrieved this (2yr looking quite dated) letter of recommendation after speaking with the patient who gave it to you just recently. Of course with this tactic... you have to deal with the HR of MXXXXal City and the patient that if ever the VO calls them, they know what to talk about... This is still being truthful, I believe, but the letter of recommendation was just wayyy to late.
Q: let's try that kaya... guys, what do you think?
check mo last paragraph of page#1 from the CIC letter, it does not mention any name of your patient or daughter of the patient it only mentions about the hospital. naging "fraud" yung work mo as a private nurse. When there is a breach of contract, then that activity that you did to breach the contact is considered as "fraud".
quote:
"we have verified that part of your submitted documentation in support of your work experience as private duty nurse is fraudulent, specifically, your contract of employment and employment certifications from the MXXXXal City hospital"
Q: hmmmm... baka talaga may non-compete section doon... check mo kaya?
anyways,let us enhance your affidavit first. then make another version that includes this possibility even if you can't get a letter of recommendation from the MXXXXal City.
