Federal Skilled Worker Class Action Lawsuit
- Thread starter admin
- Start date
i am trying to apply the FSW 2014, before asking my questions, i want introduce my self little bit,
i am indian citizen, i finished my bachelors in electrical & elctronics engg(in india) and i finished my masters in electrical& electronics(in usa) now i am working as sr .net developer(program analyst designation title) since 2010 apr, on H1b visa.
my wife also finished bachelors in computers& science in india) and masters in computers( in usa). she's working in usa.
1.can you plzz suggest me which noc code suitable for me. and
2.can you plzz how to get EAC report which organization is cheap and best?
3. how to get police clearance? do i need to get from USA or India, because i came to USA in 2010.
i am indian citizen, i finished my bachelors in electrical & elctronics engg(in india) and i finished my masters in electrical& electronics(in usa) now i am working as sr .net developer(program analyst designation title) since 2010 apr, on H1b visa.
my wife also finished bachelors in computers& science in india) and masters in computers( in usa). she's working in usa.
1.can you plzz suggest me which noc code suitable for me. and
2.can you plzz how to get EAC report which organization is cheap and best?
3. how to get police clearance? do i need to get from USA or India, because i came to USA in 2010.
What about Tim ??????
Where do his UNFAIRCIC stand.
Any news today perhaps there is hearing for appeal for rest of Tim's
Where do his UNFAIRCIC stand.
Any news today perhaps there is hearing for appeal for rest of Tim's
Is it assumption only or from any reliable source? If so what will be the resultant, do we have to wait for years . All the returned applications will be re-opened?Gaber1 said:
Posted by: Mario D. Bellissimo
The hearing at the Federal Court of Appeal that took place over two days on June 23 and June 24th in Toronto has been concluded and the Court has reserved a decision.
Our office continued to pursue arguments under section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, emphasizing that the termination of the backlog was discriminatory and had disproportionate effects on applications at Visa Offices around the world. We argued that the individual applicants terminated from the backlog were eligible applicants for permanent residence in Canada, and that the applications ought to have been assessed to determine whether they satisfied Canada’s labour-market needs (the very requirement that the Government of Canada suggested necessitated termination). Arguments including the Bill of Rights, Legitimate Expectation, Rule of Law, Procedural Fairness, the application of humanitarian and compassionate considerations as well as arguments related to section 6 and 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms were also presented to the Court by lawyers for the Appellants (applicants). After hearing the Appellants’ arguments the Federal Court of Appeal sought oral arguments from the Department of Justice on the section 7 and 15 Charter arguments. We now await a decision.
The hearing at the Federal Court of Appeal that took place over two days on June 23 and June 24th in Toronto has been concluded and the Court has reserved a decision.
Our office continued to pursue arguments under section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, emphasizing that the termination of the backlog was discriminatory and had disproportionate effects on applications at Visa Offices around the world. We argued that the individual applicants terminated from the backlog were eligible applicants for permanent residence in Canada, and that the applications ought to have been assessed to determine whether they satisfied Canada’s labour-market needs (the very requirement that the Government of Canada suggested necessitated termination). Arguments including the Bill of Rights, Legitimate Expectation, Rule of Law, Procedural Fairness, the application of humanitarian and compassionate considerations as well as arguments related to section 6 and 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms were also presented to the Court by lawyers for the Appellants (applicants). After hearing the Appellants’ arguments the Federal Court of Appeal sought oral arguments from the Department of Justice on the section 7 and 15 Charter arguments. We now await a decision.
The hearing in fedral court has now concluded and the results are awaited. From reliable sources ,Results are in favour of litigation. How this will be applied, it will be seen when it is out in sept as there are holidays in june and july in the fca.Tim case is likely to be delayed to 2015 and may take a longer period to apply.
Hi
Tim just lost another one for Investors whose applications were cancelled with the termination of the Investor program, doesn't look good for FSW. http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/72230/index.doDhamak said:We have to wait and watch the court's decision. No ideas can be worked out without knowing the contents of arguments. So keep fingers crossed.