Federal Skilled Worker Class Action Lawsuit
- Thread starter admin
- Start date
dear alljoe07 said:
My VO is New Delhi
I can access the online ecas status now. Just checked before posting
UPDATE IN FEDERAL COURT FILE IMM-7502-11
Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Respondent and Law Society of Upper Canada by telecopier on 11-MAR-2013 with respect to Direction of 7-MAR-2013 ID#129 and Letter of 8-MAR-2013 ID#130 placed on file on 11-MAR-2013
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Timothy E. Leahy by email on 11-MAR-2013 with respect to Direction of 7-MAR-2013 ID#129 and Letter of 8-MAR-2013 ID#130 placed on file on 11-MAR-2013
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Written directions of the Court: Chief Justice Crampton dated 07-MAR-2013 directing Mr. Timothy E. Leahy, a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, has been suspended by a Hearing Panel of the Law Society for 60 days, commencing on February 1, 2013, and continuing indefinitely thereafter until he has produced, to the satisfaction of the Director of Professional Regulations, certain documents. Accordingly, the Registry shall not accept any documents for filing from Mr. Timothy E. Leahy until he provides satisfactory proof that he has been reinstated as a lawyer by the Law Society of Upper Canada. received on 11-MAR-2013 Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
- 2013-03-08 Ottawa On behalf of the Office of the Chief Justice, acknowledging receipt of respondent's letter of 22-FEB-2013 and referring to Rule 126(b) of the FCR for service of documents to be tendered for filing dated 08-MAR-2013 sent to the respondent
- 2013-02-22 Ottawa Letter from Respondent dated 22-FEB-2013 seeking direction concerning service of documents to be tendered for filing further to Mr. Leahy's suspension from the Law Society of Upper Canada received on 22-FEB-2013
Does it means that the litigants of TIMS group will not benafit even though the court rules in favour of litigants by striking down 87.4?
Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Respondent and Law Society of Upper Canada by telecopier on 11-MAR-2013 with respect to Direction of 7-MAR-2013 ID#129 and Letter of 8-MAR-2013 ID#130 placed on file on 11-MAR-2013
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Timothy E. Leahy by email on 11-MAR-2013 with respect to Direction of 7-MAR-2013 ID#129 and Letter of 8-MAR-2013 ID#130 placed on file on 11-MAR-2013
- 2013-03-11 Ottawa Written directions of the Court: Chief Justice Crampton dated 07-MAR-2013 directing Mr. Timothy E. Leahy, a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, has been suspended by a Hearing Panel of the Law Society for 60 days, commencing on February 1, 2013, and continuing indefinitely thereafter until he has produced, to the satisfaction of the Director of Professional Regulations, certain documents. Accordingly, the Registry shall not accept any documents for filing from Mr. Timothy E. Leahy until he provides satisfactory proof that he has been reinstated as a lawyer by the Law Society of Upper Canada. received on 11-MAR-2013 Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
- 2013-03-08 Ottawa On behalf of the Office of the Chief Justice, acknowledging receipt of respondent's letter of 22-FEB-2013 and referring to Rule 126(b) of the FCR for service of documents to be tendered for filing dated 08-MAR-2013 sent to the respondent
- 2013-02-22 Ottawa Letter from Respondent dated 22-FEB-2013 seeking direction concerning service of documents to be tendered for filing further to Mr. Leahy's suspension from the Law Society of Upper Canada received on 22-FEB-2013
Does it means that the litigants of TIMS group will not benafit even though the court rules in favour of litigants by striking down 87.4?
HI
2. You might want to read what Justice Harrington said in an unrelated case regarding citizenship. It reflects back to what the probable decision on 87.4 is going to be.
" Mr. Richi submitted a constitutional question. I explained to him that Parliament could pass any legislation it saw fit, no matter how unreasonable, subject only to the legislative division of powers between Parliament and the provincial legislatures, as set out in sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c 3 (UK), and the Charter. His concern is really with delays and how the law has been interpreted, not with the constitutionality of the law itself. Consequently, there is no constitutional question to answer."
1. Probably not, unless he hires a lawyer in good standing to go forward with his arguments.Shajitmathew said:
2. You might want to read what Justice Harrington said in an unrelated case regarding citizenship. It reflects back to what the probable decision on 87.4 is going to be.
" Mr. Richi submitted a constitutional question. I explained to him that Parliament could pass any legislation it saw fit, no matter how unreasonable, subject only to the legislative division of powers between Parliament and the provincial legislatures, as set out in sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c 3 (UK), and the Charter. His concern is really with delays and how the law has been interpreted, not with the constitutionality of the law itself. Consequently, there is no constitutional question to answer."
hopefulever
Hero Member
- Feb 11, 2012
- 2
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- NDLS
- NOC Code......
- 4131
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 10-07-2004
- Doc's Request.
- Nov 2008
Clients of tim m lehey should not expect any kind of relief from court in near future. If he could not satisfy with his reply uptil now, then how he can do it in the next two weeks??? I hope he has not done a big blundur or fraud with any of his client.
We were not able to identify you using the information you provided. There could be three possible reasons:
•Please be sure the information you entered is correct and then try again.
•This service is only available to clients with applications in process. We may have received your application but not yet begun processing it. The following link may help you determine if your application is being processed:
Application Processing Times
•At this time, you may use this on-line service to view the status of your application ONLY if you have:
•sponsored a member of the family class;
•applied for permanent residence from within or outside Canada;
•applied for a permanent resident card (replacement or renewal);
•applied for Canadian citizenship (grant of citizenship);
•applied for Canadian citizenship for a person adopted by a Canadian citizen (on or after January 1, 1947);
•applied for a citizenship certificate (proof of Canadian citizenship);
•applied to renounce Canadian citizenship; or
•applied to resume Canadian citizenship.
The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) may help you to access the status of your application through CAS.
Any other chnage in status guys.. looms like the Dr has a chnage in status but anyone else in this group..Kindly Update ....
•Please be sure the information you entered is correct and then try again.
•This service is only available to clients with applications in process. We may have received your application but not yet begun processing it. The following link may help you determine if your application is being processed:
Application Processing Times
•At this time, you may use this on-line service to view the status of your application ONLY if you have:
•sponsored a member of the family class;
•applied for permanent residence from within or outside Canada;
•applied for a permanent resident card (replacement or renewal);
•applied for Canadian citizenship (grant of citizenship);
•applied for Canadian citizenship for a person adopted by a Canadian citizen (on or after January 1, 1947);
•applied for a citizenship certificate (proof of Canadian citizenship);
•applied to renounce Canadian citizenship; or
•applied to resume Canadian citizenship.
The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) may help you to access the status of your application through CAS.
Any other chnage in status guys.. looms like the Dr has a chnage in status but anyone else in this group..Kindly Update ....
ms32 said:
Hi,
I am one of Tim Leahy clients. Let me assure you that if the decision is in favour of litigants it will be applicable to all (including Tim Leahy group). AS far as I am concerned, I have decided to stick with Tim.
hopefulever
Hero Member
- Feb 11, 2012
- 2
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- NDLS
- NOC Code......
- 4131
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 10-07-2004
- Doc's Request.
- Nov 2008