+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
If our win based only on natural justice, it will turn down very easily in the appeal. But if based on CCRF it will not so easy to turn down.
 
joe07 said:
Date Modified: 2012-06-12

Top of PageImportant Notices

This comes on the left side of the page. Most of my friends including mine shows the same date

It is recently updated.
 
Thanks for the Vancouver Sun article. Just curious as to whether any pre-2008 applicants were ever asked to reapply under the new rules?
My online status has been consistently showing an error message and has never returned to blank i.e. in process/DM/error message.
Thank you to all forum members for the relevant case updates :D
 
BELOW IS WHAT APPEARS IN MY E-CAS

We were not able to identify you using the information you provided. There could be three possible reasons:

Please be sure the information you entered is correct and then try again.
This service is only available to clients with applications in process. We may have received your application but not begun processing it yet. The following link may help you determine if your application is being processed:
Application Processing Times
At this time, you may use this on-line service if you have:
sponsored a member of the family class;
applied for permanent residence from within or outside Canada;
applied for a permanent resident card (replacement or renewal);
applied for Canadian citizenship (grant of citizenship);
applied for Canadian citizenship for a person adopted by a Canadian citizen (on or after January 1, 1947);
applied for a citizenship certificate (proof of Canadian citizenship);
applied to renounce Canadian citizenship; or
applied to resume Canadian citizenship.
 
Yes , Our Lawyers should ask cic whether any of the pre c50 applicant was invited to apply fresh in writing due to scrapping of old applications. BIG NO. It was the duty of cic to ask in writing to apply fresh. and here cic fails in its duty. Court should and must consider this failure on the part of cic and scrap the new law.
 
hopefulever said:
Yes , Our Lawyers should ask cic whether any of the pre c50 applicant was invited to apply fresh in writing due to scrapping of old applications. BIG NO. It was the duty of cic to ask in writing to apply fresh. and here cic fails in its duty. Court should and must consider this failure on the part of cic and scrap the new law.

It's up to YOU to ask, not CIC to tell you. Plain and simple. It's like getting a driver's licence. They country doesn't come after you to get one, YOU go and get one.
 
parker24 said:
It's up to YOU to ask, not CIC to tell you. Plain and simple. It's like getting a driver's licence. They country doesn't come after you to get one, YOU go and get one.
If the driving lisence needs changes its the authority who has to inform and not the driver.
 
parker24 said:
It's up to YOU to ask, not CIC to tell you. Plain and simple. It's like getting a driver's licence. They country doesn't come after you to get one, YOU go and get one.
one more thing. If CIC was capable of answering queries then they would have even more backlog. Never found CiC to be prompt in replies.
 
It seems canada like developed country has panch raj where few punches sit and make new laws to scrap old ones made by intellectuals.
 
hopefulever said:
It seems canada like developed country has panch raj where few punches sit and make new laws to scrap old ones made by intellectuals.

No, The law used by CIC is not to scrap other old law. It is used to scrap backlog, not a law. No one made backlog by intellectuals, instead CIC lack of intellectuals hence create the backlog so long, then just realize after applicants wait more than 7 years.
 
Let me say if in the next elctions if some other party comes to power and revisit to their policy and scrap conservatives proposals then what you will say in that case. new party will just say that consers were mad and this problem.
 
joe07 said:
If the driving lisence needs changes its the authority who has to inform and not the driver.

I can't understand this sentence.
 
joe07 said:
better take some medicine and refer your old text books

If you mean it's up to government to tell you to get a DL, sorry but that's not how it is here.
 
joe07 said:
cant blame being a women u can only be thick head as ur now. U gave an example and I quoted with the example. Did I ever say about govt. please take a long walk and have a cold shower.

dude stop it now