Hello friends,
Updating the Tim´s information 14/12/2013
Dear Litigant,
Yesterday, DoJ junior counsels and I discussed how to proceed, and we appear to be pretty much on the same page. Here is the rough draft of the agreement:
1. All the Emam files, which s. 87.2, impacted will be included
a. both those who joined before the Liang decision and
b. those who joined after Liang;
2. DoJ will argue that the Agreement, if enforceable, does not
apply to those who joined after Liang; I will argue that it does.
3. If the Court rules that the Agreement is not enforceable, it
will have to rule on my argument -- which other counsel did
not make in the so-called "class action". The ruling on this
point will apply to all the litigants in the group.
4. I am to provide the follows lists of the litigants
a. those who were never assessed and
i. joined before Liang and
ii. joined after Liang
b. those who were assessed before March 29th;
c. those who were assessed after March 29th and
d. those who applied after 26 February 2008.
I can readily provide the first list, but I need those of you who fall into the other categories to notify me that you are in a different group.
In doing so, please do not hit "reply" but, rather, please create a new subject line such as:
Assessed pre March 29th: [your name] -- but only if your file is not now in process
Assessed after March 29th: [your name]
MI 1: your name
In addition, although if, at the visa post's request, you updated your file, please let me know:
updated [date]: name
Thank you,
Tim
;D
