Federal Skilled Worker Class Action Lawsuit

[joe07]

As per my Consultant, Abhinav, Delhi, all whose status showing 'Not available' will get a refund.

what did he say about applicants with blank status?

 

[joe07]

Anyone in this forum who is pre 2008 has got any positive response from CIC.. any medical update or documents to be submitted? , after june 2012

 

[wounderful]

So that whole article pretty much backs up what I've been saying all along - that the litigants in this lawsuit must find a way to win WITHOUT trying to claim Canadian charter rights and protections, because it doesn't apply to them. I'm not a lawyer, but to me it was always a matter of logic and common sense.

What I think that our lawyers (all of them) took an easy approach to claim just CCRP to win for all, and now it turn to be a very diffecult and become a challange to claim that. Once it is decided it must be appealed by either party as it has long lasting effects in future.

And at one point may Judge look at it in a clear way but when he goes in depth he got confused and invite the written submission again just to make it sure.

Again it is 50/50 for both.

 

[joe07]

Spoke to my consultant, Abhinav, Delhi, and found that around 400-500 applicants under them have similar status.

400-500 applicants imagine the number of consultants that is there in India. pheeww.. Sorry to hear about your refund dude..i hope that many would hear some good news also in the coming days ...

 

[joe07]

What I think that our lawyers (all of them) took an easy approach to claim just CCRP to win for all, and now it turn to be a very diffecult and become a challange to claim that. Once it is decided it must be appealed by either party as it has long lasting effects in future.

And at one point may Judge look at it in a clear way but when he goes in depth he got confused and invite the written submission again just to make it sure.

Again it is 50/50 for both.

wasnt yours blank status???? any update from your agent? pretty much sure the agents will have no idea but still they would give a feed back on other clients of theirs..

 

[hopefulever]

One of the applicant has informed on face book that she /He sent his son to OZ for higher study. Similarly one of my known has sent his aughter to usa some time back and they are doing well.This is a bad luck for canada that brilliant young ones are lost to other countries.

 

[joe07]

One of the applicant has informed on face book that she /He sent his son to OZ for higher study. Similarly one of my known has sent his aughter to usa some time back and they are doing well.This is a bad luck for canada that brilliant young ones are lost to other countries.

This doesn’t help the cause.. there are millions who move to different countries.. I had an opportunity to study in Canada (2001) and I chose UK London..its just not Canada that people prefer.. we all here are unhappy and feeling bad coz 6-8 years back made a decision to move to Canada and settle down. as I earlier mentioned never did I give up my career nor will i be disappointed with the decision. ( might get little pissed off coz of the whole mess that had happened) we would live another day to makes our lives even more better. so group just don’t give up hope till what ever the result maybe. till then keep ur heads up and be proud of urself for what ever you r today.. feel sorry for people who has received the refund..

 

[maran1976]

If you read the article, it gives an example on page 18 where two men were at one time LIVING in Canada (one of them for several years), and the court determined that it was STILL not enough to claim charter rights.

So that whole article pretty much backs up what I've been saying all along - that the litigants in this lawsuit must find a way to win WITHOUT trying to claim Canadian charter rights and protections, because it doesn't apply to them. I'm not a lawyer, but to me it was always a matter of logic and common sense.

Exactly my thoughts and what I have been saying too.

 

[sac]

One 2006 applicant has recieved refund which he posted on face book. He should file a case of cheating, fraud and inhumanity in the indian court against canadian govt for compensation.what others say comments are invited.

it is pointless to file such case. think of the expense, not to mention the stress of having a case in your Indian court. receive the refund, follow the advice of Counsel Leahy to encash your refund but write at the back of your check: refunded but the case is under protest.

 

[Jatt_warrior]

Fedral court ruling will definatly go against cic in this matter.Bcos if cic is not barred to do this illigal work it will go on doing this unhealthy buissness of collecting millions of dollars from the innocent people in future also , use their hard earned money for years, stall their life for years disturbibg their normal life and refund after make years by simple excuse of change in policy.CIC will set example to other countries also for how to generate funds by lying keep those million dollars ,and then return without interest.This trend of cheating and making fool of educated people is very unfortunate.

You are right. By going to court we all have done correct thing. Canadian Government should be taught a lesson for their fraudulent behavior.

 

[zolter]

You are right. By going to court we all have done correct thing. Canadian Government should be taught a lesson for their fraudulent behavior.

Come on, get real.

On one hand you are saying the "Canadian Government" should be taught a lesson for its "fraudulent behavior", and on the other you are expecting Canadian Court which is also under the Canadian Government to teach the "lesson".


By the way, I am also a litigant.

 

[j.sohi]

when did u get cheque bro

 

[Jatt_warrior]

Come on, get real.

On one hand you are saying the "Canadian Government" should be taught a lesson for its "fraudulent behavior", and on the other you are expecting Canadian Court which is also under the Canadian Government to teach the "lesson".


By the way, I am also a litigant.

What was so unreal in this? Didn't people drag their own governments to court. The purpose of judicial system to is to give justice to people and not to toe the line of the government. In India Vodafone which is a British Multinational is fighting a case with Indian government on tax issue. Going by your statement Vodafone should not have filed a case in indian court because court is under indian Government. But that is not the case. Courts work independently without Government interference.

 

[st-cnncomes]

If you read the article, it gives an example on page 18 where two men were at one time LIVING in Canada (one of them for several years), and the court determined that it was STILL not enough to claim charter rights.

So that whole article pretty much backs up what I've been saying all along - that the litigants in this lawsuit must find a way to win WITHOUT trying to claim Canadian charter rights and protections, because it doesn't apply to them. I'm not a lawyer, but to me it was always a matter of logic and common sense.

This story cannot be used as a yardstick to determing whether the canadian connection is suffecient or insuffecient. I hope the lawyers are hitting this point. What I've mentioned earlier ie, Applying under the rules to CIC, passing the points system, waiting at the behest of CIC, and having relatives who are canadian citizens are more than sufficient grounds to show our canadian connections, actually the onus to prove otherwise is not on us but on CIC.

 

[st-cnncomes]

What was so unreal in this? Didn't people drag their own governments to court. The purpose of judicial system to is to give justice to people and not to toe the line of the government. In India Vodafone which is a British Multinational is fighting a case with Indian government on tax issue. Going by your statement Vodafone should not have filed a case in indian court because court is under indian Government. But that is not the case. Courts work independently without Government interference.

Perfect example, i too thought of Vodafone. This case is quite similar. Let the FC of Canada rule against the applicants and then the actual fun will start. I'm sure CIC is aware of the vodafone case, and also the Ittalian shooting case in kerala.