Very frustrating , PNP-Inlands application are struck .It might easily cross 6 month .Not sure whats happening ,Inlands application should be the quickest as we are already in .AmBiNa said:Very few shy ppr lately!!!!!!! what's going on?!?!?!?!
Very frustrating , PNP-Inlands application are struck .It might easily cross 6 month .Not sure whats happening ,Inlands application should be the quickest as we are already in .AmBiNa said:Very few shy ppr lately!!!!!!! what's going on?!?!?!?!
Totally understand you. You can never predict how they deal with things. But maybe they think of it as since inlanders are already in they can wait more!! Nobody exactly knowamcarlos2006 said:Very frustrating , PNP-Inlands application are struck .It might easily cross 6 month .Not sure whats happening ,Inlands application should be the quickest as we are already in .
hope will get PPR soon. But others submitted same time even later, they've got PPR alreaday..... I'm confused... I'd like to call CIC. but I don't think the call center could give me any clue...Legolas_10 said:Your background check is in progress. This is usually a good sign.
I've been following closely and the latest I've seen is AOR 21-Oct. So, best case scenario, it takes 5 months if everything checks OK.abhowmik said:Is there any PPR request other than PNP-I in last couple of weeks?
I can smell a total slow down on PR processing regardless of any stream.
PNP-Is are worst among them.
Sluffy said:I have the same pattern, my early February notes say nothing more than this. And nothing happened after 2 months.
My VO is Warsaw and it has proceeded almost all applicants from this forum who applied before or even after me. I don't know if my file fell under random security scan or it is somewhere on a dusty shelf or they don't like my photo so they keep me waiting ;D
By the way, how long it took you to receive GCMS notes?
Do you have S.15, S.16 or S.19 somewhere on your notes or accompanying letter?
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-1/page-5.html#docContAumer said:Weird s.21 is written on security sections. sluffy, do u think its bad?
Raj, please advise if it means ok or something i should be worried about.
ASSESSMENTS
Eligibility: Recommend Passed
Security: Not Started
HIRV:
Criminality: In Progress
Org Crime: Medical: Passed Misrepresentation: Other Reqs:
Final:
Any thoughts on this?NOTES: 30
Created Date: 2017/02/07 11:04:10
Created By: SM8376
Updated Date: 2017/02/07 11:04:10
Updated By: SM8376
Restricted: No
Label: EE Eligibility Office: CPC-Ottawa Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Case Analyst APPLICATION: E000 REGULATION: PNP: CEC, 2016-11-19 I have verified this application under Section 11.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and make the following determination. RECOMMENDATION:***Appears to meet requirements*** Ready to Finalize
CIVIL STATUS: PA (John Wick),
SINGLE INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA (John Wick) In Status- WP Valid Until: 2017-04-15 (LMIA Exempt C430pen for Any) NO ADVERSE INFORMATION Additional Notes **WP-Ext is in progress. WORK EXPERIENCE(S): Qualifying Period: from 19NOV2013 to 18NOV2016 1) Tech Marine- (NOC2282) 2014/08- Present at ABC company LOE Salary$: $xx k/yr. Submitted letter(s) of reference 2016/11/09 which is/are assessed as follows: EDOCS NUMBER(S): 1267 The duties listed in the letter(s) of reference appear to be consistent with the actions in the lead statement under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to be consistent with a substantial number of the main duties under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to demonstrate that the PA met the minimum requirements of 12 months of work experience.
Those sections are mentioned because wherever the "confidential" information is redacted from your notes, the appropriate section that warrants the redaction has to be mentioned on the top right corner of the page. If your security is NOT "Not Started", you can assume that it is either being processed or complete (there is no definite way of knowing the difference between the two).Aumer said:Weird s.21 is written on security sections. sluffy, do u think its bad?
Raj, please advise if it means ok or something i should be worried about.
Your A11.2 has passed and so has your eligibility. I wrote about a post mentioning the differences between notes pre and post PPR. Here you go -->KrispyKreamKonnoisseur said:Just received my 2nd GCMS notes:
- Date requested: March 06th
- Date generated: March 09th
Looks like the last time they touched my app is February 07th ! However, looks like I got a Ready to finalize recommendation, and Eligibility set to Recommend Passed
Any thoughts on this?
Ranveer.35 said:Guys, I have submitted my PP to VFS Global. How I would know that my PP has reached to High Commission in New Delhi?
Do they give information through track facility on website or through SMS facility? Please Raj throw some light on it.
Raise a CSE and inform this. Upload the page of the PP showing the name on the bio page of the PP.cool2409 said:Hi Raj,
There was a spelling error of my name in passport submission request. I have enclosed an covering letter stating my correct name and submitted PP through VFS. Now I just checked and mycic account and under Document Status they repeated the same mistake of name spelling. Kindly advise for how to get the name correction.