Muito obrigadoOi Samuel, tenho certeza que o seu está chegando!
Muito obrigadoOi Samuel, tenho certeza que o seu está chegando!
I also ordered GCMs notes, for me also they are saying review required for client information. Did you find out what is it all about? Aor sep 2019Review required for client information. What does this relate to please?
I haven't gotten a certain explanation for this. From my GCMS note I think it is related to my letter of explanation and statutory questions. Also I had been requested to submit a schedule A form months ago.I also ordered GCMs notes, for me also they are saying review required for client information. Did you find out what is it all about? Aor sep 2019
https://myimmitracker.com/en/ca/trackers/fsw-outland-e-apr-tracker/cases/case-48593?p=2I also ordered GCMs notes, for me also they are saying review required for client information. Did you find out what is it all about? Aor sep 2019
Ok thankyou very much for our reply. I think its part of their procedure. Let’s cross our fingers.I haven't gotten a certain explanation for this. From my GCMS note I think it is related to my letter of explanation and statutory questions. Also I had been requested to submit a schedule A form months ago.
this makes sense, because my PR was refused and i answered yes in one of the statutory questions.
Hey. Any update?Hi all,
I have an interesting situation here.
My file was first at Edmonton VO at which my Criminality was Passed.. but on Dec 13 I got to know that my file transferred to the NDVO, the reason being my Eligibility went under Review Required.!
I applied as CEC. Me being Principal applicant (living in Canada) and my wife (living in India)
AOR Aug 4, 2019
MEP Aug 27, 2019
First GU Nov 21, 2019
GCMS applied through ATIP on Dec 16, 2019
What should I expect.?
I read through the forum and found he most common reason was related to employment letter. So, I checked my employment letter and it is including Job duties, my role, hours per week worked, salary. It has everything in it.!!
what were the supporting documents that you submitted that showed the split? i.e in your verification of employment and roles and responsibilities letter you could have just mentioned the latest role and get roles and responsibilities for that. i am also in same situation where i have 2 promotions while i was in Canada and i am conflicted on whether i should split my work ex into 3 parts and provide letter for all 3 of them (one letter split by promotion) or just mention my latest role and then provide them one letter. The second option is easier as my company will provide it without any hassle.Hello Guys,
I got the AOR on March 30, recently i received GCMS notes, from the notes i came to know that i made a mistake while creating the application. I have a 3 years of canadian work experience with the same company, in that whole experience i have two designations i.e., for 2 years my designation is software engineer and rest of experience is senior software engineer. While creating the application i did not mention that split i just mentioned 3 years as a senior software engineer, but the supporting document which i have submitted has a split. I guess because of that my application is under review. Please help me what should i do in such scenario?
Is any update for anyone on Eligibility Review required? As per GCMS notes, my file is in Review required since 1 March 2020. My AOR is 7 Nov 2019, CEC Inland?
Apply GCMS notes u will get clear idea what to dohello guys!! My eligibility review required. I am may CEC applicant. I only passed medical so far. I know i am not alone. There are so many other applicants with same situation. So please join here. We can help each other.