oldfriend said:
Can questions of the kind like "how you could survive all this time without an income" be raised in the interview .
The short answer is
yes, almost any question related to the circumstances of one's life during the relevant four years may be raised in the interview.
The more telling answer is that this may be a question CIC has and the interviewer asks questions related to it, but does not directly ask the question this particular way. That is, CIC may ask questions about employment, income, expenses, means of support, and make
inferences from the answers. There are multiple Federal Court decisions in which CIC and CJs doubted the applicant's claims as to presence and residence based
in part (not entirely) on inference there was a possibility the the applicant had a source of income from unreported employment abroad.
These cases seem to usually be situations involving families with obvious needs but with no obvious means of support,
and other circumstances raising concerns (from CIC's perspective) as to the applicant's residency. In other words, the reported cases indicating attention to this issue do not indicate that this alone would cause CIC to doubt the applicant's declarations as to residency, but if there are other
reasons-to-question-residency this can add to CIC's concerns and be a factor in a CJ's determination.
Contextual Observation:
This may appear to be, but really is not in disagreement with the post by
scylla.
Thus, while I generally avoid definitive propostions dependent on broad, sweeping generalizations, such as
scylla said:
No - this won't impact your citizenship application.
I emphatically agree with what I interpret to be the point being made:
scylla said:
The only thing that could complicate your citizenship process is if CIC has concerns you don't meet the residency requirement and requests RQ - and then you have trouble proving your days in Canada.
There is absolutely no direct tie between income and qualification for citizenship. (Over the years I have observed a number of more-affluent immigrants gnashing their teeth and muttering outloud that there is little or no advantage given those who pay a lot in taxes to Canada; and no, there is no advantage either for being poor.)
However, CIC can examine and consider the full gamut of factors and circumstances in the applicant's life for the relevant four years, and if something causes CIC to do so more closely than is done in the routine case, CIC usually will indeed tend to examine and consider the full gamut of factors and circumstances in the applicant's life for the relevant four years. Comparison of means of support and lifestyle included.
And of course there is plenty of indirect effect related to affluence or the lack thereof. Factors like home ownership, vehicle ownership, and overall stability, can affect how the overall picture looks. Steady employment, and in particular an easily documented career, can help paint a more complete picture of a life lived in Canada. In contrast, individuals living on the margins, relying on family or friends for a place to live, living largely in a cash-based economy, are at some disadvantage if and when proof of residency is in issue.
The affluent almost always have advantages. That is nature of the beast. Canada seems to do a fairly good job at leveling the playing field, as well as if not better than most countries, and particularly so given the size and diversity of both the geography and demographics of the country. Thus, while many come to Canada for economic opportunities, many others of us (me included) have come to Canada to live in a more fair and just country despite some economic disadvantage.