Document checklist question

[tink23]

Oi -.- I think we only included the first checklist. Great. Ill just have to cross my fingers tighter.

Us too! Freaking out a little! Included everything on all checklists, but didn't put in the secondary checklist because the first one also was having the same things to check off.

 

[KJG]

Us too! Freaking out a little! Included everything on all checklists, but didn't put in the secondary checklist because the first one also was having the same things to check off.

don't worry it will be okay.....I didn't include secondary checklist either..........and nothing was sent back!

 

[tink23]

don't worry it will be okay.....I didn't include secondary checklist either..........and nothing was sent back!

Ok good! That makes me feel much better. Thank yoU!

 

[KJG]

;D

 

[Cheerio]

I know, I feel better hearing these things too but at the same time I think it depends on who gets our application and how they might be feeling that day. We'll see! I don't care so much to be delayed in our application so long as I am able to live with my husband throughout it. For now the only thing I'm looking foward to is seeing him again in three weeks-- it's been almost 5 months! x.x

 

[freezing_aussie]

The fact that a number of people did not include the second checklist is not the fault of the applicants, but the very badly written instructions given ( this actually applies to the whole process in my opinion). I did include the second checklist, but that brought up yet another contradiction in the instructions. Because the documents for the immigrant are listed under both checklists, and the instructions say to clip the checklist on top, it was hard to work whether to include them in the sponsor pile or the immigrant pile. We also wanted to follow the order of the check list, but the forms and documents were listed on the two check lists in a different order. Sigh.

How difficult can it be to write a clear instructions that a reasonably intelligent person could follow?! Surely this would also make their jobs easier in evaluating the applications.

 

[tink23]

The fact that a number of people did not include the second checklist is not the fault of the applicants, but the very badly written instructions given ( this actually applies to the whole process in my opinion). I did include the second checklist, but that brought up yet another contradiction in the instructions. Because the documents for the immigrant are listed under both checklists, and the instructions say to clip the checklist on top, it was hard to work whether to include them in the sponsor pile or the immigrant pile. We also wanted to follow the order of the check list, but the forms and documents were listed on the two check lists in a different order. Sigh.

How difficult can it be to write a clear instructions that a reasonably intelligent person could follow?! Surely this would also make their jobs easier in evaluating the applications.

I kinda feel like it's almost done on purpose. If ppl feel confused and over whelmed and frustrated it might deter some ppl from applying. And if ppl make mistakes then the visa officers can just send the applications back or put it on the side for a few months...

 

[bagelbagel81]

The fact that a number of people did not include the second checklist is not the fault of the applicants, but the very badly written instructions given ( this actually applies to the whole process in my opinion). I did include the second checklist, but that brought up yet another contradiction in the instructions. Because the documents for the immigrant are listed under both checklists, and the instructions say to clip the checklist on top, it was hard to work whether to include them in the sponsor pile or the immigrant pile. We also wanted to follow the order of the check list, but the forms and documents were listed on the two check lists in a different order. Sigh.

How difficult can it be to write a clear instructions that a reasonably intelligent person could follow?! Surely this would also make their jobs easier in evaluating the applications.

I had the same issue! Wasn't until I was at the post office that I noticed I didn't have the second checklist - then after I went all the way home to print one out, didn't know where to put it! Also the website checklist had been updated between the time I had put my application together, so you are right- both checklist orders were different!
And don't get me started on the "Statutory Declaration for a Common-Law Union!" It says it only needed to be filled out if there was a co-signer ('only' is bolded on the website) so I didn't include it - then there are all these people on the forum saying it must be included if you are common-law... uh hello am I the stupid one to not believe the website or what?!

 

[AnaMaria]

The fact that a number of people did not include the second checklist is not the fault of the applicants, but the very badly written instructions given ( this actually applies to the whole process in my opinion). ......

How difficult can it be to write a clear instructions that a reasonably intelligent person could follow?! Surely this would also make their jobs easier in evaluating the applications.

I totally agree ???

 

[anonymity]

I found that CIC's guide says "You must answer all questions that apply to you. If a section does not apply to you, write “Not applicable” or “N/A”."

It's in Guide 3900.

 

[newjack45]

I am submitting my application electronically, but every time i put N/A on questions and I Validate it it tells me to take them off so i can proceed.
So what should I do?

 

[starnaenae]

I am submitting my application electronically, but every time i put N/A on questions and I Validate it it tells me to take them off so i can proceed.
So what should I do?

You cant submit your application electronically. You must mail it. Re-read the instructions in the guide and on the checklist