jazibkg said:
I know about the telephone number codes and how they work, I visit the US often. Canada isn't the US. Most people here will still have only local calling options (although I'm assuming businesses at least have Canada-wide calling) - it costs a bit more to have Canada-wide calling, and even more to have Canada+US calling activated. Sorry but in Canada, most carriers DO NOT cover entire US-Canada calling for 'free' - every bit is tiered in most plans and costs extra in cases (local, provincial, Canada-wide, US/Canada inclusive). When a job is say located in downtown Toronto, there is only a handful set of area codes the HR person will be making a callback to - with 647 and 416 being the primary ones. It also depends company to company, I met with a recruiter from a top Canadian bank, and she said that for working in downtown Vancouver we even filter the candidates down to those living within the city of Vancouver limites (meaning if you have an address in Surrey or Coquitlam, you're filtered out already).
I'm telling you the local number scenario this from personal experience, my sister went to Toronto to try and she wasn't getting any calls when she had a Vancouver number put on her resume. When she put in a Toronto number, she received a few calls shortly after. An immigrant settlement organization employee told her that they're never going to call a number that isn't local. In Canada, anyone seeing a non-Canada (or non-province, non-local to the job) number on your resume will know its a non-Canada number. When they see a non-Canada (or non-province) number, they assume (or know) that you aren't really inside the country and won't be available for an interview soon. So there goes your resume. The hiring manager, or the recruiter, will put their convenience above all else. So get an Ontario sim (a cheap one, such as Wind or Chat-r would do), put it on a dumb phone, charge $5 extra to cover roaming, and keep it on with you. This is just a suggestion as some employers use email to contact and follow-up. Or try getting a virtual number that forwards the call to your US number.
http://www.torontolife.com/informer/random-stuff-informer/2013/02/14/toronto-area-code-stereotypes-guide/
Well I guess the governments, public agencies and stakeholders make good money out of the immigration procedure. And then they don't have to pay-out in benefits for a good number of months (or a year in most instances). It works well to drive down the labour costs as well.
It's a good advise , about phone area code.
But that implicitly means I must limit myself in job search to immediate vicinity of the phone area code.
Even if I moved tomorrow to let's say Winnipeg, Manitoba, my searches would only be as good as the Winnipeg is concerned. This contradicts earlier advise by other members to widen the search area. Or at least makes it impossible. How am I supposed to at the same time throw a wide net yet be limited to an area code of my phone on the resume? Or should I open phone lines all over Canada, with every city I want to apply for a job in?
I will get a Canada phone line, just to see if it makes any difference, but as you see if true it only means that any search outside of that specific area code will be futile.
In regards to labor costs, I found an article online which pretty much sums up what we have going on.
It's the same for US as it is for Canada.(Not exactly the same in terms of specifics, such as specific companies and types of jobs involved in downsizing, but the same in a sense that on a big picture scale the same mechanism and rationale are at work).
================================================
Reliance of Corporations center on MBA's from the best business schools. Gone is the respect for knowledge gained by those who have worked for companies for decades, and understand what made their companies successful.
January 09
17:45 2015
It is very likely that the unemployment rate, which dropped to 5.6 percent today, will rise in 2015. We heard today that both Macy's and J.C. Penney will be closing stores this year. Many other major corporations are considering downsizing or eliminating service and goods in areas which are not profitable. There are multiple reasons for their decisions; some have credence, but some appear to be decisions regarding profits of the CEO's and Board of Directors. Is this oversaturation or simply corporate greed?
It was predictable that retail stores across the United States would be closing their doors. Online purchases are on the rise. The need to ‘shop' for anything can be done more quickly and more efficiently on the internet for many commodities.
Consumable items are seldom included in the changes of our nation's purchasing pattern.
Thursday the soft drink giant Coca Cola announced changes in the way they will operate in 2015. Management will eliminate 1,600 to 1,800 jobs around the world. Upper management will be rewarded by saving nearly three billion dollars.
In all fairness to Coca Cola, it has made attempts to adapt to a changing market. Although the results are questionable given recent studies of obesity in our nation, consumers claim attention towards more health conscious products. The soft drink giant attempted to market a product called ‘Coca Cola Life,' which was low in calories and contained less sugar.
The company failed at virtually 100 percent of their marketing campaigns. The fiscal quarter which ended in September revealed that profits were reduced by 14 percent. Coca Cola reported a mere profit of 2.1 billion dollars for the quarter. That's right, billions.
Coca Cola never considered reducing the price of its biggest sellers. Instead they reduced the size of their cans and bottles and raised the prices. Once again a major corporation demonstrates that greed is more important than the employees who labor for the profits of upper level executives and shareholders.
A few of the major corporations which are considering the elimination of jobs, a form of restructuring, or the entire eradication of some operations are; General Electric, Microsoft, Nordstrom, Hewlett-Packard, Kellogg, Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors. These are only a few of those considering changes to maintain bloated profits.
Working America; those who are paid hourly wages and find it difficult to save money, or who live in fear of a medical crisis which would cost them security and eliminate their present way of life, have many misconceptions about big business.
Americans who work for profitable companies feel that their jobs are secure. That assumption is far from the truth. Major corporations care little about humanity; profits are their only priority. If reducing the workforce is a viable option to increase profitability, they are quick to eliminate jobs.
At the opposite end are small businesses. The expense to train qualified employees makes them less likely to reduce their workforce.
It appears logical that downsizing the number of employees will increase profits. Again, untrue. Historically companies which have reduced their workforce numbers have seen little or no increase in profitability.
Companies frequently claim that downsizing simply removes unnecessary labor, and secures jobs for those who remain. This is a complete fallacy. Remaining employees experience a decrease in morale, and an increased workload with no monetary compensation.
Numerable other facts prove that business practices actually result in less production, and an erosion of quality.
America was at its peak in the 1990's until NAFTA removed many of our better paying jobs.
In the 21st century corporate profits and the profits of shareholders trump concern for the workers who are responsible for the company's success.
Reliance of Corporations center on MBA's from the best business schools. Gone is the respect for knowledge gained by those who have worked for companies for decades, and understand what made their companies successful.
By James Turnage
Op-Ed
Sources:
RT
Workforce.com
USA Today
Photo courtesy of Mike Mozart
James Turnage is currently a writer and editor for The Public Slate, a subsidiary of the Guardian Liberty Voice. He is also a novelist who is in the process of publishing his fourth effort. His responsibilities include Editing, reporting , managing.
http://thepublicslate.com/2015/01/oversaturation-or-corporate-greed/