+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Denied Citizenship due to lack of proof of English

Rigly68

Hero Member
Apr 16, 2013
768
89
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
Richie888 said:
I believe it shows 65
It actually states 14-64.

Hibee04 the MP you spoke to has no clue about the requirements for citizenship it seems. He is also wrong with telling you to take English classes. As other members have stated IELTS or CELPIP - cheaper in the LS version - are some options if you want to be sure that your language proficiency will be accepted.
Yes it is frustrating but you are not alone...many of us have faced the same. In the end it was well worth it for me personally as my application went straight through in no time :)
 

oldfriend

Star Member
Mar 26, 2011
172
1
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
hibee04 said:
thanks.. Its just ridiculous.. I checked and you have to go to one of their centres to take the test and it costs $309. Another tax grab?
so to get my citizenship it's going to cost me almost $1000 whereas they just give it away to some.
Why don't you try CELPIP-General LS, it's easy and cheap. only $175 but you have to book your seat at the nearest center to you as early as possible.
 

simoncanada

Hero Member
Dec 3, 2015
297
13
oldfriend said:
Why don't you try CELPIP-General LS, it's easy and cheap. only $175 but you have to book your seat at the nearest center to you as early as possible.
now it is $185 not $175
 

oldfriend

Star Member
Mar 26, 2011
172
1
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
simoncanada said:
now it is $185 not $175
ha ha, that's expected since everything here is getting more expensive, but still better than IELTS for this purpose
 

dpenabill

VIP Member
Apr 2, 2010
6,435
3,183
hibee04 said:
The Canada web site still shows 55 so they should bloody honor that. If they're too damn lazy to update their information. even my local MP didn't know that the age was raised from 55-65.

Not really.

The following is quoted from the IRCC online eligibility information:

see http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/citizenship/become-eligibility.asp#language

Language abilities

Canada has two official languages—English and French. To become a citizen, you must show that you have adequate knowledge of one of these languages. In general, this means you can:

-- take part in short, everyday conversations about common topics;
-- understand simple instructions, questions and directions;
-- use basic grammar, including simple structures and tenses; and
-- show that you know enough common words and phrases to answer questions and express yourself.

If you are 14 to 64 years of age, you must send documents with your citizenship application that prove you can speak and listen in English or French at this level.



For emphasis: If you are 14 to 64 years of age, you must send documents with your citizenship application that prove you can speak and listen in English or French . . .

Moreover, the document checklist to be submitted with the application clearly states that the language requirement does not apply if the applicant is 65 years of age or older.



I agree that the requirement to submit DOCUMENTS, as specified by IRCC, can be rather inconvenient for older applicants from English speaking countries, but as others have observed, the requirements are clearly stated and there are relatively easily done tests to verify ability in English which will generate adequate documentation to meet the application requirements. (Note: for those whose English is not their first language and whose ability in English may have been sufficient to get documentation of language ability, but who otherwise might not be maintaining their ability, a Citizenship Officer may still examine and assess the applicant's language ability. That is, document showing test passed does not necessarily guarantee this requirement is met. Ability in language must still be shown in interview with IRCC officer.)


There is proposed legislation to revert the age for meeting the language requirement to less than 55. That is part of Bill C-6, which is currently bogged down in the Senate, but which should eventually become law. But it is not the current law and IRCC is required to apply the current law.