I also need it. Somebody please share.erable_rouge said:hey Managersonline, do you have a list of the last NOC-wise CAP update?
I also need it. Somebody please share.erable_rouge said:hey Managersonline, do you have a list of the last NOC-wise CAP update?
managersonline said:As requested by several members, I am posting here the total number of applications received under each NOC as per update published by CIC on 16th December 2014.
Please note that the CIC update of 16th December update reflects the total number of applications received on or around 15th of October 2014 for each NOC.
Therefore there are more applications received during the approximate period of 15th October till 31st December 2014.(viz. 77-days applications are to be added to know real number of applications of each NOC)
=======================
NOC13 ------->Applications: 219
NOC15 ------->Applications: 107
NOC111 ------->Applications: 531
NOC112 ------->Applications: 445
NOC113 ------->Applications: 405
NOC121 ------->Applications: 195
NOC311 ------->Applications: 100
NOC711 ------->Applications: 113
NOC712 ------->Applications: 28
NOC811 ------->Applications: 8
NOC911 ------->Applications: 266
NOC1111 ------->Applications: 931
NOC1112 ------->Applications: 1001
NOC1113 ------->Applications: 0
NOC1114 ------->Applications: 274
NOC1123 ------->Applications: 822
NOC1212 ------->Applications: 367
NOC1224 ------->Applications: 52
NOC2113 ------->Applications: 71
NOC2131 ------->Applications: 600
NOC2132 ------->Applications: 907
NOC2133 ------->Applications: 777
NOC2145 ------->Applications: 82
NOC2171 ------->Applications: 1000
NOC2172 ------->Applications: 370
NOC2173 ------->Applications: 1000
NOC2174 ------->Applications: 1000
NOC2232 ------->Applications: 61
NOC2234 ------->Applications: 38
NOC2241 ------->Applications: 136
NOC2243 ------->Applications: 71
NOC2263 ------->Applications: 256
NOC2281 ------->Applications: 715
NOC3011 ------->Applications: 28
NOC3012 ------->Applications: 1000
NOC3111 ------->Applications: 45
NOC3112 ------->Applications: 112
NOC3132 ------->Applications: 42
NOC3141 ------->Applications: 16
NOC3142 ------->Applications: 469
NOC3143 ------->Applications: 16
NOC3214 ------->Applications: 10
NOC3215 ------->Applications: 21
NOC3216 ------->Applications: 22
NOC3233 ------->Applications: 133
NOC3234 ------->Applications: 14
NOC4011 ------->Applications: 813
NOC4151 ------->Applications: 44
NOC4214 ------->Applications: 184
NOC5125 ------->Applications: 205
==========================
Total ------->Applications: 16122
==========================
Charging is not based upon NOC. But charging is done based on FIFO (if cap is not filled either overall cap or noc cap).oladelemary said:Hello,
Any news about NOC 3233.? When was the last cc charge for this NOC.?
Applied on dec. 24 2014 , yet to get charged.......
Quite anxious
That's so sad, but it does make sense in some level.managersonline said:Charging is not based upon NOC. But charging is done based on FIFO (if cap is not filled either overall cap or noc cap).
But it is purely on FIFO basis and there is only and just only one stack of all applications irrespective of NOC. And completeness check is conducted irrespective of NOC and hence as a result charging is also done irrespective of NOC and it is purely based on chronological order of applications receipt date.
What I can observe from latest downloaded Spreadsheet of FSWP2014, there isn't any charging happening after 4th March.
Means three working days of CIO (5th,6th,7th march) without charging, really raises a red flag about overall 25K CAP. I don't have any intention to hurt anybody. But if CIO didn't resume charging on Monday then it will be clearly a news that FSWP2014 is fully CAPPED to 25K.
Specially as per latest downloaded version of spreadsheet, there are around total of 5888-applications, which are as per several estimates reflects 25% applications of worldwide applicants. Therefore 5888*4 = 23552 of total applications at CIO. Moreover PHD stream of 500-applicants is already capped, as reported earlier by an applicant. Therefore 23552+500 = 24052-Applications which is more or less nearabout 25K. Whereas most of the December applicants didn't take headache of coming to this forum and registering in the Spreadsheet. Even several of those who are on the forum are not entering their details in SS of FSWP2014.
But still let us hope that these statistical figures will prove false and all of December applicants will start to hear good news on Monday.
Wish all of you best of luck. And let us all hope for good news to be heard.
managersonline said:Charging is not based upon NOC. But charging is done based on FIFO (if cap is not filled either overall cap or noc cap).
But it is purely on FIFO basis and there is only and just only one stack of all applications irrespective of NOC. And completeness check is conducted irrespective of NOC and hence as a result charging is also done irrespective of NOC and it is purely based on chronological order of applications receipt date.
What I can observe from latest downloaded Spreadsheet of FSWP2014, there isn't any charging happening after 4th March.
Means three working days of CIO (5th,6th,7th march) without charging, really raises a red flag about overall 25K CAP. I don't have any intention to hurt anybody. But if CIO didn't resume charging on Monday then it will be clearly a news that FSWP2014 is fully CAPPED to 25K.
Specially as per latest downloaded version of spreadsheet, there are around total of 5888-applications, which are as per several estimates reflects 25% applications of worldwide applicants. Therefore 5888*4 = 23552 of total applications at CIO. Moreover PHD stream of 500-applicants is already capped, as reported earlier by an applicant. Therefore 23552+500 = 24052-Applications which is more or less nearabout 25K. Whereas most of the December applicants didn't take headache of coming to this forum and registering in the Spreadsheet. Even several of those who are on the forum are not entering their details in SS of FSWP2014.
But still let us hope that these statistical figures will prove false and all of December applicants will start to hear good news on Monday.
Wish all of you best of luck. And let us all hope for good news to be heard.
However, George, could you please help to analyse is there any chance that people have already been charged by now still have to face the risk of overall cap?managersonline said:Charging is not based upon NOC. But charging is done based on FIFO (if cap is not filled either overall cap or noc cap).
But it is purely on FIFO basis and there is only and just only one stack of all applications irrespective of NOC. And completeness check is conducted irrespective of NOC and hence as a result charging is also done irrespective of NOC and it is purely based on chronological order of applications receipt date.
What I can observe from latest downloaded Spreadsheet of FSWP2014, there isn't any charging happening after 4th March.
Means three working days of CIO (5th,6th,7th march) without charging, really raises a red flag about overall 25K CAP. I don't have any intention to hurt anybody. But if CIO didn't resume charging on Monday then it will be clearly a news that FSWP2014 is fully CAPPED to 25K.
Specially as per latest downloaded version of spreadsheet, there are around total of 5888-applications, which are as per several estimates reflects 25% applications of worldwide applicants. Therefore 5888*4 = 23552 of total applications at CIO. Moreover PHD stream of 500-applicants is already capped, as reported earlier by an applicant. Therefore 23552+500 = 24052-Applications which is more or less nearabout 25K. Whereas most of the December applicants didn't take headache of coming to this forum and registering in the Spreadsheet. Even several of those who are on the forum are not entering their details in SS of FSWP2014.
But still let us hope that these statistical figures will prove false and all of December applicants will start to hear good news on Monday.
Wish all of you best of luck. And let us all hope for good news to be heard.
I can understand....everybody is ridden with fear and uncertainty. Charging does not guarantee a PER> we have come across cases where people were sent NERs after being charged. However, Let us not lose hope!fsqsunshine said:However, George, could you please help to analyse is there any chance that people have already been charged by now still have to face the risk of overall cap?
Friends, please do not blame me asking this negative question.
Just too worried.
Sorry......
Yes that could be a typographical error by the person who entered these details. That's what I can say otherwise what I have mentioned the method at CIO, I am hundred percent assured about that. It is just FIFO, no more no less, irrespective of NOC. It is just datewise first come, first served principle.Svarog said:according to the SS, there is a 31.dec applicant who not only got charged, but received PER (!),
also, as I recall, there were reports from other forums of 30.dec applicants who got charged...
if the charging is done based on FIFO method, then why is there a 31.dec applicant who got charged (and received PER) if the overall cap was reached after 29.dec?
a hoax or an error maybe?
Information is based upon one of the PHD stream applicant who got his application returned and found in the letter that it was returned due to sub-cap reached.enghope said:Hi,
Can you please share the link shows that PhD stream capped. It was only 227 applications received on November on CIC website .please any information!!!!!
NO, it will not happen. Those who got already charged or whose applications are already in "In Process", have already been counted in the CAP. Because charging is only done if CAP is not reached. Similarly application is put in "IN PROCESS" if CAP is not reached. Therefore those already gotton charged should be 100% confident that they are already counted in the CAP, and should expect PER. Although NER is only given if points<67, or Experience not matched, but in FSWP2014, just only 2-3 applicants got NER. Rest of them all got PER.fsqsunshine said:However, George, could you please help to analyse is there any chance that people have already been charged by now still have to face the risk of overall cap?
Friends, please do not blame me asking this negative question.
Just too worried.
Sorry......