Hi Everyone!
We submitted an application under conjugal as to our situation.
*We both lived in Dubai SA(CA citizen) not married. and by Law is not allowed to live together. hence, we cant apply for Common Law nor spousal. We submitted a notarize letter indicating that It is indeed not allowed to live together if you are couple and not married by Law
We recieve a PFL indicating there that there were no grounds for marriage at all.
We are both single opposite sex and planning to settle down in CA once might get approve.
Yet our concern is we dont want to forcely get married just for the sake of PR.
also my partner is Muslim and im a Christian.
We want free willingly to celebrate covenant without any holds of religious matter.
Whats your thought about it?
will they likely refuse our application?
My guess is that your application will be refused. Not an expert, though.
Did your spouse apply for a trv to Canada and get refused? If not, it will definitely be refused.
The onus is upon you to demonstrate a barrier (external) to you getting married or residing common law. "Not wanting to get married" does not meet that test.
There's no requirement that the marriage be a religious one - even a common-law relationship is at heart a civil relationship.
On top of that:
-you would not need to just demonstrate that eg Dubai does not permit unmarried couples to live together, but even opposite sex 'non-conjugal' couples to establish common law. (Not certain but seem to recall having seen cases here of opposite sex partners living together in Dubai, they basically just said they're room-mates for purposes of local authorities - again, could be wrong).
-you'd also have to show that civil or interfaith marriage not possible in Dubai.
-assuming you are both able to travel to other countries, the question would arise of why you didn't just travel to another country to get married in a civil ceremony.
-most importantly of which, if the non-Canadian (non citizen or non-PR) did not apply for and get refused a visa to Canada, you could have travelled to Canada to get married in a civil ceremony.
Again: 'not wanting to get married' is not a good argument. It's not a barrier - it's your own decision. The test is not ABLE to get married or establish a common-law relationship.
And I repeat what I believe to be the misconception: a common-law relationship is not the antithesis of marriage; it is a civil relationship akin to marriage entered into by residing together. (Hence the 'objection' to marriage is abstract). There are cases of those who cannot get married
legally - the barriers usually being no divorce allowed, same-sex, or in somewhat more rare cases, inter-faith marriages are illegal.
You could perhaps make an argument about not wanting to or being forbidden to have a religious marriage - but again, the burden of proof would be on you to demonstrate that you cannot carry out a civil marriage.
If you really insist on this, you might consider a lawyer - your arguments would have to be quite complete and waterproof and factual to have a chance.