+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
scylla said:
Yes - there are several. To the best of my knowledge someone holding an Indian passport requires a visa to enter every single one of them.

In that case, his only option is to go to India and live with him for 12 months and apply again under common law. I don't see how an appeal would help his situation. Agree ?
 
gsize said:
In that case, his only option is to go to India and live with him for 12 months and apply again under common law. I don't see how an appeal would help his situation. Agree ?

how can he do that?
In India it's illegal and how can he live with me? I'm not open to my family and it's not possible for us to live under one roof. My family is against gay scene and they also started thinking because of him I'm not marrying.

we have wills, life insurance policies, phone call records, Western union receipts, Skype chat history, WhatsApp chat History, Trips to Nepal & Thailand together, lots of photographs together and with my family and friends. some getting cards to each other.
everything is almost 4 years old .
And we are also trying to get married in a gay marriage supporting country. (we also tried to get married in Nepal and got married there in august 2012 but that marriage is not a legal marriage until Nepal is not going to get it into their new constitution).
 
gsize said:
In that case, his only option is to go to India and live with him for 12 months and apply again under common law. I don't see how an appeal would help his situation. Agree ?

I actually disagree. It's most likely impossible for them to live together in Indial for 12 continuous months. I would actually move forward with the appeal if there was strong supporting evidence provided that they are in fact a conjugal couple and have been unable to get married anywhere or live together.
 
scylla said:
I actually disagree. It's most likely impossible for them to live together in Indial for 12 continuous months. I would actually move forward with the appeal if there was strong supporting evidence provided that they are in fact a conjugal couple and have been unable to get married anywhere or live together.

I agree. The conjugal partnership class is designed for cases such as in this thread, where there is a significant legal barrier to a committed couple living together long enough to establish a year's cohabitation. However, the class itself is an "exceptional" one, so while based on the information presented here I think an application would be well-justified, we should expect it to be scrutinized.