The direction of Canada by bringing more and more burden here while the good meaningful jobs are extremely difficult to get is not so bright. If I had a good job I would be so angry to pay from my taxes the bills to people working at the low end. Look at already the huge debt of Canada, guess who will pay that debt.screech339 said:
we already see the direction toward the Greece destination.
And how would the government know that this family spent x number of years abroad, came back and because of that no 100% benefits to you yet, what is the difference if this time a natural born Canadian left and worked abroad for 30 years and came back here same no 100% benefits to you too or no you are good because you were not immigrant.torontosm said:
You can use the his mindset too when you leave Canada by saying I didn't get any benefits from Canada and therefore I am not CoC of Canada. This is I guess his logic.Jee786 said:
Yes and No. CoC's seek to acquire citizenship for the purposes of a safety net in the first place. A Canadian born in Canada would not fall into that category since they acquired citizenship because they were born in Canada. However, you can say that their parents immigrated to Canada to get their child a citizenship. Then that child can be an "anchor baby"Politren said:
My medical care and education was all private in Pakistan. And, for the short period of time I lived in Pakistan, I and my family all paid taxes so we were entitled to use the public services. Satisfied?Politren said:
Politren said:
Actually CoC can be applied to Canadian born who left Canada for 30-40 years and return to retire in Canada accessing free medical care they have not paid into all their lives.pie_vancouver said:
What is the reason to call me rasist, I guess the facts which I showed that the dominant part is from South Asia made me under your understanding such??? I don't see anything wrong to show some official data about the recent newcomers and their source countries. What is the problem with that?torontosm said:
The fact that Canadian born were contributed all their lives here is not an excuse if they are out of Canada. Why Canadian should pay their medical care when they might not be residents in Canada at that time. They are typical CoC and should be banned from using Canadian benefits.screech339 said:
So by the same logic, marriage of convenience doesn't exist as a legal definition?Politren said:What is the reason to call me rasist, I guess the facts which I showed that the dominant part is from South Asia made me under your understanding such??? I don't see anything wrong to show some official data about the recent newcomers and their source countries. What is the problem with that?
CoC simply doesn't exist as legal term, you are trying to prove here something which is full with subjectivity. If it was a problem it would be a long time in the criminal code. Do you realize how funny your whole pushing here is regarding this imaginary CoC spooky thing ;D
Do you see that everyone here has different understanding about CoC. This is because is Subjective. Now according to screech339 even a Canadian born here can be CoC. At the beginning of the topic was clear that it could apply only to those Canadians born abroad
I really want to see some day a legal definition of CoC. That "issue" is in the lingo for a long time and still nothing official. I really want to see the first case of someone stripped from citizenship by being accused and proven guilty as being CoC. Good luck meanwhile by creating proper definition ;Dscreech339 said:
