Not possible to visit in person. Try submitting a web form. You likely also want to get advice from a lawyer.There might be some solution to this. Shall I visit IRCC office in Toronto ? They are not even responding on call.
Not possible to visit in person. Try submitting a web form. You likely also want to get advice from a lawyer.There might be some solution to this. Shall I visit IRCC office in Toronto ? They are not even responding on call.
here is my understanding, OP was in Canada on TRV when applied for PR. They travelled in June for wedding and during that time, they received email from IRCC asking whether they are in Canada or not. OP replied that they are out of Canada, IRCC halted the process. OP came back to Canada on 31st July (not landed as PR as such), replied to IRCC informing that they are now in Canada. They also informed that they are now married. IRCC still went ahead and issued eCoPR as is case with inland candidates. The confusion, which I too had earlier, is that they did not LAND as PR in Canada, they just returned to Canada on TRV. To me, OP did right thing and can hope to receive reply from IRCC on their intimation about family composition change. Your thoughts ? @scylla - yours as well.How did you land as a PR with a TRV?
Your spouse would have needed to be added to your PR application. You don't simply add their name at the last minute.
I was not PR when I landed.How did you land as a PR with a TRV?
Your spouse would have needed to be added to your PR application. You don't simply add their name at the last minute.
Yes sir. Thank you for understanding. I hope IRCC gives reply.here is my understanding, OP was in Canada on TRV when applied for PR. They travelled in June for wedding and during that time, they received email from IRCC asking whether they are in Canada or not. OP replied that they are out of Canada, IRCC halted the process. OP came back to Canada on 31st July (not landed as PR as such), replied to IRCC informing that they are now in Canada. They also informed that they are now married. IRCC still went ahead and issued eCoPR as is case with inland candidates. The confusion, which I too had earlier, is that they did not LAND as PR in Canada, they just returned to Canada on TRV. To me, OP did right thing and can hope to receive reply from IRCC on their intimation about family composition change. Your thoughts ? @scylla - yours as well.
I'm not confident on that. I recommend speaking to a lawyer in an earlier post. What I would have done in this situation is first notified IRCC I was married and waited for this to be acknowledged and the additional forms to be requested before telling IRCC I was back in Canada to trigger the eCOPR and landing process.here is my understanding, OP was in Canada on TRV when applied for PR. They travelled in June for wedding and during that time, they received email from IRCC asking whether they are in Canada or not. OP replied that they are out of Canada, IRCC halted the process. OP came back to Canada on 31st July (not landed as PR as such), replied to IRCC informing that they are now in Canada. They also informed that they are now married. IRCC still went ahead and issued eCoPR as is case with inland candidates. The confusion, which I too had earlier, is that they did not LAND as PR in Canada, they just returned to Canada on TRV. To me, OP did right thing and can hope to receive reply from IRCC on their intimation about family composition change. Your thoughts ? @scylla - yours as well.
Yes I know I made a mistake by not doing this. Now I'll have to speak to a lawyer. I hope I'll be able to sponsor my spouse or I'll have to leave this country. I can't stay without her.I'm not confident on that. I recommend speaking to a lawyer in an earlier post. What I would have done in this situation is first notified IRCC I was married and waited for this to be acknowledged and the additional forms to be requested before telling IRCC I was back in Canada to trigger the eCOPR and landing process.
Then why was the word `Landed' used in such context? It's beyond confusing.here is my understanding, OP was in Canada on TRV when applied for PR. They travelled in June for wedding and during that time, they received email from IRCC asking whether they are in Canada or not. OP replied that they are out of Canada, IRCC halted the process. OP came back to Canada on 31st July (not landed as PR as such), replied to IRCC informing that they are now in Canada. They also informed that they are now married. IRCC still went ahead and issued eCoPR as is case with inland candidates. The confusion, which I too had earlier, is that they did not LAND as PR in Canada, they just returned to Canada on TRV. To me, OP did right thing and can hope to receive reply from IRCC on their intimation about family composition change. Your thoughts ? @scylla - yours as well.
Yes became PR on 14th Aug, returned to Canada in July on TRV and informed about change in martial status then. So it was before they became PRThe `confusion' continues.
The OP stated that they received the eCOPR yesterday. If that is the case...does that mean that they are now a PR?
https://www.canadavisa.com/copr.html
Once you become a permanent resident, and are registered in the Permanent Residence Portal, IRCC will make an e-COPR (electronic Confirmation of Permanent Residence) available to you through the portal. This document serves as proof of your new status in Canada.
Yes. This is the standard process now for inland economic immigration applications.The `confusion' continues.
The OP stated that they received the eCOPR yesterday. If that is the case...does that mean that they are now a PR?
https://www.canadavisa.com/copr.html
Once you become a permanent resident, and are registered in the Permanent Residence Portal, IRCC will make an e-COPR (electronic Confirmation of Permanent Residence) available to you through the portal. This document serves as proof of your new status in Canada.
But the landing date (yesterday) was after the marriage, correct? Unless the OP `officially' added the spouse before yesterday, does that not mean that the spouse can no longer be sponsored?Yes became PR on 14th Aug, returned to Canada in July on TRV and informed about change in martial status then. So it was before they became PR
Yes, (virtual) landing was after marriage. Yes OP informed about change in martial status before yesterday, however the point at which OP informed is subject to a debate. here is what I have knowledge about "inland" candidates.But the landing date (yesterday) was after the marriage, correct? Unless the OP `officially' added the spouse before yesterday, does that not mean that the spouse can no longer be sponsored?
Part of [my] problem is that when I landed the eCOPR option had not yet been created. Inland applicants had to attend an in-person interview, with their sponsor, before being handed their PR documents.Yes, (virtual) landing was after marriage. Yes OP informed about change in martial status before yesterday, however the point at which OP informed is subject to a debate. here is what I have knowledge about "inland" candidates.
Step 1. IRCC sends out email asking them if they are in Canada. If the reply is yes, IRCC moves to step 2. If no, IRCC holds on to the process, the candidates needs to inform IRCC once they are back in Canada for IRCC to proceed to step 2.
Step 2. IRCC sends outs username/password for the portal and asks candidates to upload a valid Canadian address and photo.
Step 3. IRCC sends eCoPR (pdf version of CoPR, no hard copy is sent out. this is kind of virtual landing)
In this case, OP replied at step 1 that they are currently out of Canada. They entered Canada on TRV, replied to IRCC saying now they are in Canada. IRCC moved to step 2. OP then informed the change in marital status, also updated a Canadian address and photo. IRCC sent out eCoPR with status as "single"
@kai0910 - am I correct here ?
True, as I recall, this eCoPR concept started as a measure for CoVID 19 situation. The in person interviews no longer holdPart of [my] problem is that when I landed the eCOPR option had not yet been created. Inland applicants had to attend an in-person interview, with their sponsor, before being handed their PR documents.
I suspect that this is also because the old Condition 51 was repealed several years ago. That's likely why, in part, sponsors had to attend the landing interviews with the new PR.True, as I recall, this eCoPR concept started as a measure for CoVID 19 situation. The in person interviews no longer hold