And he signed the forms? Well, who to blame then?travel desk wrongly filled 'No' to the 'Have you been refused a visa previously' question.
And he signed the forms? Well, who to blame then?travel desk wrongly filled 'No' to the 'Have you been refused a visa previously' question.
It's not sad - it's irresponsible on the part of the applicant. The applicant is responsible for all of the information in the application regardless who completes it.flx2015 said:that is really sad.
Either you read this question yourself and answer honestly or you check all the forms and correct mistakes and only THEN you sign. OR you lie, or your adviser lies and you let him to.most applicants end up making mistakes and getting 5 year bans. why do they bother asking the applicant if the visa officer is able to dig up that information themselves? is it a relic from back when everything was paper based?
Not sure why you think it's "most". It's not. If it was "most" the volume of refusals would be insane. The vast majority of applicants have no issues answering this question correctly. A very very small minority either lies or doesn't read the question properly. There's no problem with the application - the problem is with the people who complete the application. It's a very simple question. Not sure why you're so fixed by this.flx2015 said:agreed that it's the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all questions are answered correctly, but it looks to me like that one question (past refusals) is where most applicants end up making mistakes and getting 5 year bans. why do they bother asking the applicant if the visa officer is able to dig up that information themselves? is it a relic from back when everything was paper based?
Exactly!There's no problem with the application - the problem is with the people who complete the application.
Same is happening with my husband. Recently we recieved the email of accusation that he said the answer"no" which he never had applied for any visa. They give uHi,
Applicants must be honest. Honesty is non-negotiable for visa apps.
5-years ban for misrepresentation are given only after due scrutiny and investigations are done. Also, an applicant is given 30 days to prove that the visa officer is wrong.... before a decision/ban is given.
It could be genuine oversight/misunderstanding a question in the case of some applicants.
You'll be fine if you check/re-check your wife's TRV application to ensure there are no factual errors or typos.... before you sign/submit it
Cheers
Was your mother given a misrepresentation ban or just refused?Hey same case!
My parents applied for visa
Mom was rejected 2 years back.
Agent filled it and said sorry now. They receive that you have given wrong information. Now agent is saying you should re apply asap to prove them that you are innocent instead of giving a gap and applying next year.
I am confused. Any suggestions.
Hi I'm in same situation, how did your case end?Same is happening with my husband. Recently we recieved the email of accusation that he said the answer"no" which he never had applied for any visa. They give u
The PFL letter is your chance to correct IRCC if they think you misrepresented something in your application - but you didn't and IRCC made an error.Why IRCC still refuse VISA with misrepresentation after answering the procedural fairness letter truthfully and honestly
Hi I'm in same situation, how did your case end?
[/QUOTEThe only way i think is to get an immigration lawyer which is very costly to fix the problem