ushiee88 said:
yea i dont agree with him either.. it is back log. once the application has been put in processing it becomes back log whether they touch it or not. anyway back log or not the msg has to be sent across.
I appreciate the letter is good and well drafted. However this backlog may misrepresent, as you know they always look for broader picture.
Guys to make you understand,
the MR was issued on sequence and
stopped after providing MR to an 11th august applicant. From 11th August applicant to October applicants there is no progress after that. (Only who done upfront medicals got updated in ECAS and couple of French got MR)
If it require to be a regular processing the MR issuance should be continued...
I am late august applicant and some other august applicant with me were not received MR and continuously applied for notes and seen that no progress as of end of October. So it means they stopped and wanted to start again.
Here the processing stopped and it is required to be RESUME. Here why it become backlog.
If you say backlog, then even a single application that is waiting for more than 3 years due to some real criminal or other reasons also considered as backlog. please understand my point.
I am just putting my opinion, why it is not be called as backlog. Just to mention our concerns clear.