That is not Implied Status; that's saying that an applicant can be sponsored by their spouse while in Canada illegally, with no status. I believe that policy was brought in to help long-time illegals, ones that had been living in Canada without status for years with their spouses and children, who didn't want to submit an application because they feared deportation. Implied Status comes solely from submission of the OWP.automaton82 said:As such, it can be concluded that implied status still rings true for inland applications, but the procedure for OWP has changed (and whether or not you can keep working like before, I do not know).
Being financially responsible for him for 3 years means that you are responsible for making sure that he has what he needs to live without going on welfare. If he refused to work, you would be required to support him. If he went on welfare in those 3 years, you must pay the government back for it.Brigitteisveryspecial said:Which brings me to a new question: how come they accept applications from Ontario Disability Support Program, yet say that I must be financially responsible for my husband for three years? So both of us have to live off my disability payment of $1100 monthly because they won't allow him to support us? That's a joke. And not logically feasible. Unless we stay at the Salvation Army shelter, and go to food banks! Not the life I envisioned for my family!
Basically, it is to prevent the fraudsters that come to Canada and leave their spouse from living off of Canadians. There have been many cases where PRs have left their spouse as soon as they landed in Canada and ended up on welfare; here's a good example http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/russian-bride-leaves-elderly-man-with-25k-welfare-bill-1.1258077.
For those in a real relationship, it doesn't really mean anything. I'm financially responsible for my partner for another 2 years but he would never expect me to support both of us; we both work and pay the bills together.