+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
JasFer said:
Senator Jaffer's tweets can sometimes misleading as twitter may only show her reply, without the question that she is replying to. This has more to do with Twitter, and less with her.
nothing misleading in the twit mentioned a few posts ago. It clearly said ' will have to move to ' not 'have moved to'
 
itsmyid said:
nothing misleading in the twit mentioned a few posts ago. It clearly said ' will have to move to ' not 'have moved to'

I was just replying to a previous forum member. It isn't my thought.
 
spiritsoul said:
To remind you of who is Senator Eaton:

Action Date Days from previous Spoken by: Adjourned by:
First Reading 6/17/2016 - Omidvar Eaton
Chamber Sitting: 56 9/27/2016 102 Eaton Jaffar


She is the first one who dragged the first concept of delay for 102 days including the summer break!
OMG. This is actually quite scary. If early next week Senator Nicole Eaton decides "Oh no, I'm not ready yet", we're screwed...
 
MarceauBletard said:
OMG. This is actually quite scary. If early next week Senator Nicole Eaton decides "Oh no, I'm not ready yet", we're screwed...

We should tweet Sen. Omidvar the following, Senator Eaton tactic is to delay this bill another 162 days as she did before. I am sure she knows but it is nice to let her know that we know.
 
I don't get why people make a big deal out of these 102 days? I mean the Senate didn't even sit in all of July and August. So of course if Senator Eaton adjourns the debate right before the break, there will be a long break until she can speak.
 
I told you guys this bill highly chance to pass by 2017

And now it looks I was correct

Where is is those people who disagreed with me .
 
MarceauBletard said:
OMG. This is actually quite scary. If early next week Senator Nicole Eaton decides "Oh no, I'm not ready yet", we're screwed...

It's not 100% up to Sen Eaton. Can other senators say No to her adjournment?
 
Varangian said:
It's not 100% up to Sen Eaton. Can other senators say No to her adjournment?

Formally yes. However, it is usual policy in the Senate that Senators wait for the person who asked for adjournment.
 
Sumonaney said:
I told you guys this bill highly chance to pass by 2017

And now it looks I was correct

Where is is those people who disagreed with me .

Oh I'm sorry I must have missed that this is a competition in who was right in retrospect. :-)
 
Now that we're seeing some light at the end of the tunnel, can someone summarize what would be implemented right away when this bill passes and becomes law?
 
Senator Jaffer just tweeted that there will be many more amendments to the bill, it looks like we might have rejoiced a bit early
 
New Tweet :(:

Jaffer: #C6 Very sorry to let u know there will be many more amendments introduced . Today it is on language requirements #SenCA
 
CIC must start preparation now for high volume of applications on their way.......
Most of us already completed 1095 days or on edge of fulfilling days criteria some of us will get credit of Pre-PR time as well at end of day up-to reaching citizenship oath it will be same time line. Currently CIC processing application from start to end almost in 6-8 months which can increase up to 14-18 months remember they have same workforce.

I am extremely happy for strip out citizenship amendment but not very hopeful that things will change due to 3/5 rules

Good luck to all who are in same boat as me :)

Thanks
Syed B.
 
smilermail said:
New Tweet :(:

Jaffer: #C6 Very sorry to let u know there will be many more amendments introduced . Today it is on language requirements #SenCA

Wow... That sounds like a very bad news to everybody who is waiting for the Bill to become a law soon! Looks like we can expect weeks of discussion, adjournments and votes again.
The question is why all those amendments are being introduced at that late stage! The Senate is like a bad student who waits until the last moment to start preparing for the final exams.
 
Varangian said:
Wow... That sounds like a very bad news to everybody who is waiting for the Bill to become a law soon! Looks like we can expect weeks of discussion, adjournments and votes again.
The question is why all those amendments are being introduced at that late stage! The Senate is like a bad student who waits until the last moment to start preparing for the final exams.

I think conservatives know what they are doing but liberals and non-affiliated senators don't know much!