True. But their filibustering appears to be being quite successful as a stalling-the-vote tactic. Harder must be asleep. Can anyone send him a double-double?Seen12 said:Conservatives running out of facts and relying on emotions to attract votes
True. But their filibustering appears to be being quite successful as a stalling-the-vote tactic. Harder must be asleep. Can anyone send him a double-double?Seen12 said:Conservatives running out of facts and relying on emotions to attract votes
They haven't delayed the Bill since the last time where they asked for 3 adjournments, the Bill is being debatted at every sittingChippyBoy said:True. But their filibustering appears to be being quite successful as a stalling-the-vote tactic. Harder must be asleep.
Incorrect. The Conservative caucus has been endeavouring to thwart this Bill every step of the way.Redfield said:They haven't delayed the Bill since the last time where they asked for 3 adjournments, the Bill is being debatted at every sitting
spyfy said:Yay they'll vote in 45 minutes and this stupid discussion will finally be over.
But just on the amendment, right?spyfy said:Yay they'll vote in 45 minutes and this stupid discussion will finally be over.
Yayyyyy ;Dspyfy said:Yay they'll vote in 45 minutes and this stupid discussion will finally be over.
Possibly. I would assume that right after the vote debate gets adjourned until tomorrow. And since nothing has been heard of another amendment in the pipeline, they might debate and vote on third reading tomorrow, actually. Fingers crossed.MarceauBletard said:Yayyyyy ;D
What's next? Vote on the whole bill and back to HoC, eh?
It's not that they don't trust the call. The conservatives simply want to have it in writing, name by name, that Senator such and such voted with no. That way they can use it later for their propaganda.razerblade said:always two cartoons who stand up and initiate a standing vote.