Applications after 26/6 in any NOC CONNECT HERE TO GET THE STATUS

[beaanddrei]

Guys, come on! I see at least 30 odd people viewing the tracker now .. Please come forward to give your first 3 digits of your file numbers

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.

mine starts with E00 ;D

 

[Cappuccino]

Dear Wayne, in Aug' 10 when i was getting my application ready, my consultant had said that PCC were required to be submitted along with the application. i got them ready in August, but then she said rule changed, no need to send them now, so we did no send them, are with me.
These PCCs are from India and Abu Dhabi.. If we get a PCC request before Aug, are these sill valid or I will have to get new ones ??

You will have to get new ones. The PCC can be no older than 3 months old when CIC first receive it (either at CIO or VO). As long as it is received within 3 months of being issued, it has a total validity of 12 months. If the decision is not finalised within 12 months of the PCC being issued they will ask for a new one anyway.

Wayne.

 

[ramgupta]

mine starts with E00 ;D

Mine is with B05

 

[kolhapuri]

B05 for me too. E-CAS status is still - In Process

 

[Cappuccino]

B05 for me too. E-CAS status is still - In Process

Updated
Wayne.

 

[Cappuccino]

Mine is with B05

 

[Cam1234]

Got this letter dated 9 February 2011 from the Singapore VO this afternoon. Contents appears to be more a 2nd AOR for the pre-26 June 2010. Definately unlike the one posted by ladyk at Page 864.

Hi Temasek:

Well the good news seems to be that your VO seems to have received your application, and the bad news, you may have to go through the trouble of contacting your VO to inform them of the mistake they have made...

One thing that stood out for me, with the link to the Visa Offices someone provided yesterday. In every VO there seemed to be 2 or 3 Canadians and 10 or more local employees. I am beginning to wonder how well informed, regarding the new post June 26 policies, these local employees are... for I am certain they are the ones responsible for sending all these confusing letters and emails...

Cam

 

[Rupal]

Application number : E00

e-CAS status : CIO-S ER complete

-Rupal

 

[kolhapuri]

Hi Temasek:

Well the good news seems to be that your VO seems to have received your application, and the bad news, you may have to go through the trouble of contacting your VO to inform them of the mistake they have made...

One thing that stood out for me, with the link to the Visa Offices someone provided yesterday. In every VO there seemed to be 2 or 3 Canadians and 10 or more local employees. I am beginning to wonder how well informed, regarding the new post June 26 policies, these local employees are... for I am certain they are the ones responsible for sending all these confusing letters and emails...
Cam

I dont think they have made any mistake. They clearly say - They have his submission and they are processing it. They have only used a different format than manila VO and it is more like pre june 2010 format. I don't think it is a mistake.

 

[Dr.Hasib]

I dont think they have made any mistake. They clearly say - They have his submission and they are processing it. They have only used a different format than manila VO and it is more like pre june 2010 format. I don't think it is a mistake.

well, if that isn't a mistake then why they are requesting to submit his docs to VO again?

 

[kolhapuri]

well, if that isn't a mistake then why they are requesting to submit his docs to VO again?

It isnt. The letter says -

This refers to your application for permanent residence in Canada, which was initially submitted to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia. The CIO recommended your application for further assessment at a visa office and sent you a letter requesting that you submit a complete application package to this office. We have now received your submission.

read the bold. They say we have received your submission. They are NOT requesting any documents. So it is not a mistake. Read it again.

 

[Dr.Hasib]

It isnt. The letter says -

This refers to your application for permanent residence in Canada, which was initially submitted to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia. The CIO recommended your application for further assessment at a visa office and sent you a letter requesting that you submit a complete application package to this office. We have now received your submission.

read the bold. They say we have received your submission. They are NOT requesting any documents. So it is not a mistake. Read it again.

thanks for clarifying my doubts
+1 from me

 

[Jocelynandjuno]

Application number : B05

ECAS status : IN PROCESS

 

[Naija Pikin]

Guys, come on! I see at least 30 odd people viewing the tracker now .. Please come forward to give your first 3 digits of your file numbers

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.

Mine is B05...

 

[Temasek]

It isnt. The letter says -

This refers to your application for permanent residence in Canada, which was initially submitted to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia. The CIO recommended your application for further assessment at a visa office and sent you a letter requesting that you submit a complete application package to this office. We have now received your submission.

read the bold. They say we have received your submission. They are NOT requesting any documents. So it is not a mistake. Read it again.

The mistake is instead in this sentence -

"This refers to your application for permanent residence in Canada, which was initially submitted to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia. The CIO recommended your application for further assessment at a visa office and sent you a letter requesting that you submit a complete application package to this office. We have now received your submission."