Applications after 26/6 in any NOC CONNECT HERE TO GET THE STATUS

[mchowdhury]

Dear mchow.,
Thanks for share.
After sending PER letter, usually VO does not make any reply.
Today, I make a call. But automatic answer was not satisfactory.
So, I post a letter for my status. Hope ,this is the best way to get satisfactory reply.
Who have got their PER, should communicate their VO as mine.
SIngapore VO adress:
To
Canadian High Commission
Immigration Section
Robinson Road, P.O. Box 845
Singapore
901645 Singapore


Consular Section Telephone: (65) 6854-5900
Consular Section E-mail: spore-cs @ international.gc.ca
Consular Section Fax: (65) 6854-5913

Pl. communicate ,if something new!
Ziaul

Thanks.
Please let us know on the progress/if they respond.

 

[made711]

Kind of blue...

 

[grimreaper]

Please somebody add my details as well:
NOC CODE- 1122
VISA OFFICE- New Delhi
RECEIVED BY CIO- Oct. 28, 2010
METHOD OF PAYMENT- BD(Not encashed until 31st of Dec'10)
POLICE CLEARANCE : Not Sent

 

[Amro Elsayed]

Hi Wayne.

Could you add my details, please?

Name: Vrachar
NOC: 3131
VO: Vienna
Application received by CIO: 07-Dec-2010
Payment method: CC
CC encashed: 09-Dec-2010
Police Certificate req: Sent with app
Thank you.

Dear Vrachar

welcome to the forum and i added your details


Amro

 

[Amro Elsayed]

Kind of blue...

IS THIS what i think you got you PER or what ????

Amro

 

[Amro Elsayed]

Kind of blue...

YEEEEEEEEEEEEES it is

congratulation my friend i updated your status and really it is good to see you in blueeee

Amro

 

[Cam1234]

Kind of blue...

Congratulations made711!! ​

This is GREAT news for everyone who has been left behind! Very happy for you!
Cam

 

[Temasek]

.....That means for some reason (though stupid) your file is being assessed as per 28 Nov. rules. Although your NOC wasn't even in demand in that 38 list. They have mentioned that "If you submitted original supporting documents, these are being returned to you and are enclosed as you may be required to submit these with your full application"....

Applications will be process based on the prevailing Ministerial Instruction applicable at the time of submission, and consequently a post June 25 applicant will not be processed in accordance to the procedures applicable before that. This has also been clarified in the Canadian Gazette Notice which followed the release of the June 26 Ministerial Instruction – http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2010/2010-06-26/html/notice-avis-eng.html#1.

There is definitely a disconnect between CIO and VO in this instance, and they quoting and attaching an AOR applicable to those under the 28th November 2008 Ministerial Instruction just confirms this.

But having said that, I would also add that having 2 VOs make a similar mistake is quite worrying!

Cheers.

 

[Amro Elsayed]

Please somebody add my details as well:
NOC CODE- 1122
VISA OFFICE- New Delhi
RECEIVED BY CIO- Oct. 28, 2010
METHOD OF PAYMENT- BD(Not encashed until 31st of Dec'10)
POLICE CLEARANCE : Not Sent

Added you details my friend so please confirm us when your BD will be encashment

Amro

 

[made711]

Dear Amro and Cam, thank you very very much!
I'm still in shock, but happy!

 

[arasah]

Kind of blue...

Wow Congratulations!
made711, though it is too late to receive PER.
anyway welcome to PER club and we are very happy to hear your news.
made711 just enjoy the day.

Rgds-
Arasah

 

[smiler 11]

congratulations.

 

[Temasek]

Congratulations to all who have received their PER, and especially to made711! Its been a long wait for you to be "kind of blue". Cheers.

 

[Cur-Rozen]

Kind of blue...

Ho, ho, ho .... happy PER ever! Congratulations!

 

[Cam1234]

But having said that, I would also add that having 2 VOs make a similar mistake is quite worrying!

Hi Temasek, I wouldn't worry about it too much. The guidelines are clear. There are possibly instructions sent to VOs from CIO with each individual post June 26 application that VO receives, as to how they should proceed with them...

Since none of our applications have reached VO, the officers are using the standard email responses they have been sending in the past years. In my opinion this is just a mistake, that is all. But it would be necessary for people receiving these emails to contact their VOs and point out the error.

Cam