Congrats Victory ..........Victory said:Hallo friends, I've got PER on Jan 11 , correct encashed date to Sept 21.
Thanks.
It is interesting to see now who receives PER today. Coz. now it has become unpredictable.
Congrats Victory ..........Victory said:Hallo friends, I've got PER on Jan 11 , correct encashed date to Sept 21.
Thanks.
You forgot about Chinsan. He is the Man of the moment right now. Got his PER on 7th Jan though his application was received by CIO on 6 Oct 2010katyspring said:
Hi Every body!
Victory, MSM and Sukhi:
My hearty Congratulations!
Hi there!Dr.Hasib said:You forgot about Chinsan. He is the Man of the moment right now. Got his PER on 7th Jan though his application was received by CIO on 6 Oct 2010
Hi. We can add him to the rejected applications tab if you can give us full details.chima1980 said:Dear Wayne or Anil
After reviewing from the p683,I found out that one of our member (Beshocar) got the refusal letter from CIO. But somehow I didn't see his/her information updating on the spreadsheet. I'm pretty sure that his/her DD/CC was deducted in Sept . Because of lacking activation he/she might be remove from our list.
Can you update on the spreadsheet ?
Beshocar case was rejected because of insufficient points after encashment.
Chima
Furthermore, Wayne. Remember letter to Robin? They described in details how much points he got, for what exactly and what was the points maximum. I am sure this work is completely done by CIO.Cappuccino said:Hi. We can add him to the rejected applications tab if you can give us full details.
Rejected due to insufficient points is interesting, because it would seem to confirm that CIO tally up the points to ensure 67 have been reached before mailing the application to visa office, lending weight to the belief that visa office will just do security/background checks and medicals.
Wayne.
Cappuccino said:Hi. We can add him to the rejected applications tab if you can give us full details.
Rejected due to insufficient points is interesting, because it would seem to confirm that CIO tally up the points to ensure 67 have been reached before mailing the application to visa office, lending weight to the belief that visa office will just do security/background checks and medicals.
Wayne.
Hi Guys, I can confirm that my Application was received by CIO this morning, signed for by one G. Miller. I'll like to add my details to the spreadsheet please, thanks. My details are displayed on the left. Thanks to all who have kept this thread going.
9j
Additional info:
Mode of payment - Credit card
PCC: Not Included in Original Application
According to something I read from a Qorax post, the main security/background checks are done AFTER medicals (since these are apparently the most costly part of the visa office processing and they won't do these until they are sure everything else is ok).Cur-Rozen said:Furthermore, Wayne. Remember letter to Robin? They described in details how much points he got, for what exactly and what was the points maximum. I am sure this work is completely done by CIO.
WayneCappuccino said:Hi. We can add him to the rejected applications tab if you can give us full details.
Rejected due to insufficient points is interesting, because it would seem to confirm that CIO tally up the points to ensure 67 have been reached before mailing the application to visa office, lending weight to the belief that visa office will just do security/background checks and medicals.
Wayne.
Dear 9jcanada9jcanada said:Hi Wayne,
I posted this in previous page. Doesn't seem to have been noticed
Tnx