kefche1 said:
OK I agree but why do you say it only in regards to the London VO?
The lack of logic in the order of processing of the applications applies to all VOs.
And if there is logic in the order in which the applications are processed in the VOs then we can't understand it simply because we don't have the details of the forum members.
Let's ask the people who have already received visas if they are married and with how many children if any.
Other useful info would be if they have lived in only one country hence needed only one police clearance.
Then let them tell us if they had only 1 employer or 10 for example which will mean respectively 1 or 10 references needed to be checked by the Visa Officer.
etc..
We can't judge the work of the VOs without knowing the details of the applicants.
Dear kefche1,
Just have a look at my case:
- Married with NO children
- Lived in ONLY ONE country since birth (both of us)
- Worked in ONLY ONE company since beginning in ONLY ONE NOC (against which I have made the application)
- No LANGUAGE problems as such: IELTS' band score: 8.0
- No criminal record
- CREDENTIALS exceeding what are required in the applied NOC
- The company for which I am working is the MOST RENOWNED AND LARGEST COMPANY in my country
- Excellent paperwork with EVERY BIT OF INFORMATION provided
- Spouse is highly educated and therefore, could help us establish in Canada
- Funds exceeding appreciably than what are required
I mean have you seen such a straightforward case?? and still RBVO!
Ammaar