Applications after 26/6 in any NOC CONNECT HERE TO GET THE STATUS

[majorhell]

Good Afternoon Everyone,

I have a news for you guys, My consultant informed me today that they have received a letter from NDVO asking me to appear for an interview. The date mentioned for interview is of next month. They have already forwarded me the letter by post so they cant send me a scan copy now. I will get it in a day or two and i will post the content of this letter here once i receive it.

Thank you.

Please Update my Status:

Ecas Status : RBVO
Interview : Yes

 

[JasonBourne]

I don't mind if they don't tell me.....At least they will know what is causing the delay

But I am sure there will be some situations that (though true) may not look like a genuine case to the assessing VO..........

LOL!

Jason, you're trying to convince people to open their Pandora's Boxes.

Some things are better left closed (unsaid).

Cheers!
DarKnight

 

[nazafarin]

Added but more data required

the first 3 digits of your file no starts with Bxxx 0r Exxxx
Current residency country
Your Ecas status and when it was last update?
And PLEASE ANY UPDATE SEND IT IN GREEN TO BE RECOGNIZED

@ mchowdhury updated, I put last update date 14 april is it so?

Thanks

the first digital my app.file is E.
the last update my e-case is right now Shocked Shocked Shocked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(isn't funny) Grin Grin.... which is written "Received_by Visa Office "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and my current residency country is Iran...

 

[dibs]

To all MR waiting ND VO applicants,

I was thinking as to why some of the applicants who got 2nd AOR long back have not received MR requests (and also not 'In process')......One point that I can think of is any situation that can create a doubt in the mind of the VO.......May be genuineness of the submitted documents and claims made in the application etc.......Well in my case - I got married 3 months before the application date and that may create a doubt in the mind of the VO (showing a fake marriage to claim points) - but in fact my score crosses 67 points even if I don't count points for my spouse's qualifications........Other than that my application is as straight as a die........

I am sure there will be something that holds them back while assessing our applications.........Any confessions?? .........You can say 'Not me but my friend did.........'

JasonBourne

In my opinion , the NDVO guys are all busy with student visa applications for the May intake and things should move ahead rapidly once that task is over...

 

[majorhell]

In my opinion , the NDVO guys are all busy with student visa applications for the May intake and things should move ahead rapidly once that task is over...

Immigration and Student visa's are handled by different departments of VO and have different staff.

 

[yukon]

Immigration and Student visa's are handled by different departments of VO and have different staff.

That is very much true.

 

[made711]

Please update our status - In Process (since April 11th)

Thanks...

 

[anil04_10]

To all MR waiting ND VO applicants,

I was thinking as to why some of the applicants who got 2nd AOR long back have not received MR requests (and also not 'In process').........
................................You can say 'Not me but my friend did.........'

JasonBourne

I fully agree with you Bro .... BUT this marriage issue is a much bigger scam than you have mentioned ....
It is not just getting additional adaptability points, but the whole immigration itself. Very common in India & Philippines. There is a pre-arranged setup for such contractual marriages, where the point factor is immaterial (PA alone will have more than 67 points). The actual catch is to immigrate the other half ...... .... After everyone gets PR card, people get back to their original life. It is a fool proof scam of human trafficking legally ....of course CIO is trying their level best to curb/stop this. BUT it IS there........ ???

Cheers, Anil

 

[Sanam Pao]

Don't worry MiTSch, your PER walking somewhere with my PER.

Sanam Pao welcome to the forum, I wish you fast process

Viktoria

Thank you Viktoria.
Keeping fingers crossed for your PER ASAP.

 

[amar12345]

Good Afternoon Everyone,

I have a news for you guys, My consultant informed me today that they have received a letter from NDVO asking me to appear for an interview. The date mentioned for interview is of next month. They have already forwarded me the letter by post so they cant send me a scan copy now. I will get it in a day or two and i will post the content of this letter here once i receive it.

Thank you.

Please Update my Status:

Ecas Status : RBVO
Interview : Yes

Good News

A step in the positive direction. Given me a chance I am all in for the Interview.

Please NDVO call me.

 

[made711]

You can also add country of birth and country of residence: Serbia
Destination: Toronto, ON

Thanks, one more time

 

[infiant]

I fully agree with you Bro .... BUT this marriage issue is a much bigger scam than you have mentioned ....
It is not just getting additional adaptability points, but the whole immigration itself. Very common in India & Philippines. There is a pre-arranged setup for such contractual marriages, where the point factor is immaterial (PA alone will have more than 67 points). The actual catch is to immigrate the other half ...... .... After everyone gets PR card, people get back to their original life. It is a fool proof scam of human trafficking legally ....of course CIO is trying their level best to curb/stop this. BUT it IS there........ ???

Cheers, Anil

Proposed changes for spousal sponsorshipsWednesday, 30 March 2011 Category Federal Immigration As Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the Government of Canada have noticed an increase in the number of fraudulent marriages, they are proposing changes for the Family Class immigration category, specifically for spousal sponsorships.

Under the Family Class category, Canadian permanent residents and citizens are able to sponsor their spouse or common-law partner (non-Canadian) for Canadian permanent residency. Currently, once a spouse/partner lands in Canada as a permanent resident, they are not obliged to stay with their spouse/partner.

The Government of Canada is proposing to impose a “conditional permanent residence” for non-Canadian spouses or partners who have been in a relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years or less. The newcomer would have to remain in the relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years upon their arrival in Canada. If the newcomer decides to leave his/her spouse/partner, the permanent residence status would be revoked, which may result in their removal from Canada.

The second change would impose a “sponsorship bar”. Sponsored spouses or partners would not be able to sponsor a new spouse/partner for at least five years.

The Government of Canada is accepting comments from the public regarding the proposed changes for the next 30 days.

 

[DarKnight]

Proposed changes for spousal sponsorshipsWednesday, 30 March 2011 Category Federal Immigration As Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the Government of Canada have noticed an increase in the number of fraudulent marriages, they are proposing changes for the Family Class immigration category, specifically for spousal sponsorships.

Under the Family Class category, Canadian permanent residents and citizens are able to sponsor their spouse or common-law partner (non-Canadian) for Canadian permanent residency. Currently, once a spouse/partner lands in Canada as a permanent resident, they are not obliged to stay with their spouse/partner.

The Government of Canada is proposing to impose a “conditional permanent residence” for non-Canadian spouses or partners who have been in a relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years or less. The newcomer would have to remain in the relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years upon their arrival in Canada. If the newcomer decides to leave his/her spouse/partner, the permanent residence status would be revoked, which may result in their removal from Canada.

The second change would impose a “sponsorship bar”. Sponsored spouses or partners would not be able to sponsor a new spouse/partner for at least five years.

The Government of Canada is accepting comments from the public regarding the proposed changes for the next 30 days.

Good idea...

I am sure this will crackdown the illegal migrants to a large extent.

DarKnight

 

[CB]

Please Update...Recieved RPRF reciept dated 04-04-11
CB

 

[Cappuccino]

Proposed changes for spousal sponsorshipsWednesday, 30 March 2011 Category Federal Immigration As Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and the Government of Canada have noticed an increase in the number of fraudulent marriages, they are proposing changes for the Family Class immigration category, specifically for spousal sponsorships.

Under the Family Class category, Canadian permanent residents and citizens are able to sponsor their spouse or common-law partner (non-Canadian) for Canadian permanent residency. Currently, once a spouse/partner lands in Canada as a permanent resident, they are not obliged to stay with their spouse/partner.

The Government of Canada is proposing to impose a “conditional permanent residence” for non-Canadian spouses or partners who have been in a relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years or less. The newcomer would have to remain in the relationship with their Canadian sponsor for two years upon their arrival in Canada. If the newcomer decides to leave his/her spouse/partner, the permanent residence status would be revoked, which may result in their removal from Canada.

The second change would impose a “sponsorship bar”. Sponsored spouses or partners would not be able to sponsor a new spouse/partner for at least five years.

The Government of Canada is accepting comments from the public regarding the proposed changes for the next 30 days.

http://www.canadavisa.com/news/entry/proposed-changes-for-spousal-sponsorships-110330.html

If anyone is looking for a source! Several consultant/lawyer sites are reporting this, however I can't find anything "official" about it from CIC.

Anyway, if this is true it is a good step I think. Currently it is too easy for someone to get into Canada with an arranged marriage and then file for divorce the day after they land.

Wayne.