Given his timeline, NeverGiveUp most likely has passed selection factor. Can we confirm that the email was sent by FA01772? Or was it some other department? In any case, even if it wasn't FA01772, I'm almost certain he has passed selection factor. As S_Govind said, it is not the first time that RCMP finger-print based PCC has been asked of applicants.
tahhiir said:
I didn't add any TA or RA experience in my application. Based on current rejection, I am planning to add my work experience as TA/RA along with industrial experience.
What do you suggest should I modify Schedule 3 for Work experience. In section 8, Work in Canada, I previously said no I didn't do any full-time work in Canada. What should I write now?
2ndly, should i need to change the amount of assets as due to my newly born baby I have to increase the amount of money in my account?
Other than experience letter, and six month bank history what extra documents should i attach?
Hi tahhiir, do you mean that you are planning to add TA/RA experience to your application that is currently processing, or is it for new application? If it is to supplement your current work experience, it's hard to say. OP6B mentioned the following
Officers must consider only those occupations which the applicant has specified and for which the applicant has provided the four-digit NOC code on their application form (R80(6));
It doesn't say that the four-digit NOC and the occupations need to be specified at the time of application, so you can argue one way or another.
EDIT: okay, if we analyze the particular subsections that the above passage refers to
80(5) A skilled worker must specify in their application for a permanent resident visa the four-digit code of the National Occupational Classification that corresponds to each of the occupations engaged in by the applicant and that constitutes the skilled worker's work experience.
80(6) An officer is not required to consider occupations that have not been specified in the application.
It says that an officer is not required to consider occupations not specified in the application. Now, obviously one can always argue that if we provide supplemental letter of reference for a new NOC, then technically we have specified that particular occupation in our application. Again, it's ambiguous and can go either way.
