This happened to many applicants here including me. Last year, they used to not accept updated letters and only count the letters sent with original application. However, this year I have seen some cases that CIC accepted updated letters. It's not very clear yet to me but if they replied and said they do not accept, then your chances are very low, though this is only my opinion.GeographyPhD said:Hi Forum!
I was recently rejected for PR under the PhD stream. Looks like many others had the same problem. Their reason was that one of my reference letters did not state the main duties performed and hence making my work experience not count for the continuous full time employment.
I then appealed, even there is NOT a formal appeal process. My grounds was that I did include the main duties performed in the letter and that it must have been misplaced. I just received a reply rejecting my appeal on the grounds that there is no appeal and that I did not include the letter.
Question 1: Does CIC have a system for 100% making sure that they do not misplace documents? I am 99.99% sure that I included the letter in question and that it sufficiently described the duties of said employment. In their response they said:
"Your application for Permanent Residence in Canada was considered on its substantive merits according to the applicable section of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and was refused. Any different or new information that you have submitted cannot be taken into consideration."
And
"NOTE: The letter you submitted from University XX you submitted with your response was not part of your original application and thus cannot be used in a re-assessment."
I wonder if it is worth persevering or whether I should just (sic) make a new application?
Question 2: continuous employment (full/part time) I think is my main weakness. In a related forum asbereth notes that 1,950 hours of continuous work experience is required. I am a 4th year PhD student and have been continuously employed as an RA and a TA through my 2year MA and the frist 3 years of my MA. These have been smaller contracts: 64hrs, the odd 80 and 120 hours, but I am still not sure that this amounts to 1950 hours. Could anyone provide clarification, please? Is there anyone in the same situation who has been granted PR and yet only did small - albeit continous - RA/TA work.
Finally: I know that I don't have to re-do the English test (thankfully, especially because its my first language), but do I have to send original documents, or signed documents again, even though they have a copy of them already?
Thanks so much. Any help is much appreciated.
Regarding any appeal system, there is nothing like that in CIC. I dragged my case until 3-4 months after they rejected me. I tried to make them accept my updated letters. They never said they do no accept updated letters, but they didn't either accepted my updated letters with the excuse that the new letters do not represent sufficient duties.
I ended up re-applying.