I understand that you're an arrogant idiot and cannot understand nuance.I understand you are an immigrant and English is NOT YOUR first language.
Most of this is not true - although some of what you're saying is responding to claims that I have not made.If you have evidence or literature available, from a reliable source, that proves MPs are obligated to or have tools at their disposal to either 'pressure' IRCC, suggest, recommend, to complete processing of an application - then please provide the link. Do you have it?
Otherwise, dont spread false information on this forum. MPs CANNOT influence IRCC in anyway, nor can they ask, request, suggest or take any action to get an application processed. PERIOD!
What I said specifically was this: "And most frequently, I assure you, MPs asking repeated questions can influence ircc to move things along."
Government departments serve ministers. Ministers have colleagues in the house of commons, known as MPs, because the ministers themselves are also MPs. MPs speak to each other.
Now there are several mechanisms by which government departments and ministers and MPs have set up mechanisms to ensure that no IMPROPER influence is exercised. But MPs can and do ask questions.
There are, in fact, several specific mechanisms set up to allow MPs to get information and ask questions. MPs can also write to ministers - and they do. They and their staff speak to the Minister's staff and the minister directly.
And again: they cannot IMPROPERLY influence anything - ask for special treatment, etc. Ask for a particular decision to be made, for example.
But then can - and do! - ask what is up with a file and why it is taking so long. For example.
Most of the time there may not be much that comes back as a response. As I noted, if there are security issues (MPs usually stay well away from those).
But sometimes when inquiries are made from a minister's office, an actual issue (a mistake in processing) is found, and it gets quickly resolved. Or a file gets moved along because (humans are humans) repeated questions from the minister's office get noticed.
I would bet dollars to doughnuts that there is a tracking system to keep track of MP's requests.
I have seen this in action. Personally.
As for 'obligations' and rules binding MPs, you can look it up yourself:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_04_9-e.html
From which I find: the role of an MP includes "getting action out of the government on problems of constituents."
Or: "They act as ombudsmen by providing information to constituents and resolving problems."
Or from their conflict of interest code:
"Assisting constituents.
A member does not breach this code if the member’s activity is one in which members normally and properly engage on behalf of constituents."
You can check the standing orders of the House here:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/standing-orders/Index-e.html
There is nothing barring MPs from making inquiries on behalf of constituents, including of substance, or helping to resolve their problems with government, as long as they do not attempt to improperly influence government decisions.
Evidently you did not understand the nuances of these topics.
If you cannot understand the content of these links, I suggest you get in the sea, on the basis that you're unfit to comment further on the topic.