I think the issue is this: What is considered sufficient papers and documents? The IO that interviewed my husband concluded the following:
1. we are different ages and stages and races. (Even though we share the same faith, speak fluent English and are university educated).
2. we met on the internet.
3. my husband is a student and thus does not have a job and therefore has no income. I am the primary support. Essentially they said he was poor and I was rich.
We have photos from my 3 trips to Africa. Emails, some chat, limited Skype records, some online cards, phone records. A copy of our marriage certificate and wedding photos. We had a quiet short wedding that fits our personalities.
But I am worried that it all looks very one sided. Most of the documents come from me. My emails to him, my calls to him, my gifts to him, my cards to him.
My husband is not a romantic guy. He is an introvert. In many ways he is a typical guy who forgets his anniversary, his wife's birthday and doesn't think to send a card.
So I am very frightened that we might lose because we do not have the right kind of evidence or sufficient evidence.
Peach
Hasan9999 said:
If you have submitted sufficient papers and documents to prove your case, there should not be a problem. Just be yourself and speak with full confidence. In my PR appeal, my lawyer failed to submit enough documents to prove my case though he fully assured me several times to win very easily. I was also took it very lightly, not even consulted forum like this or any other competent lawyer. BTW my Bay Street lawyer was quite expensive who failed miserably. My suggestion is that you are the best consultant and whatever needed to prove your case , just do it.