SJTZ said:
Attention please :
Yesterday I received my second GCMS and it has a lot related to Visa Center. My initial application was sent mentioning their address, though later i did all my works by myself, changed the address and thought it was over. Now in my second GCMS, see what i have found in a note section:
"This application is one of over 60 that have been identified to date as an undeclared and unqualified immigration consultant called Visa Cent6er Inc. It has been identified based on a combination of one or more of the following commonalities. 1. A common mailing address 2. Common format and font for the family composition sheets with bangla script. 3. common format of employment certificate. 4. Common format of pay slip. Given the involvement of an undeclared and unqualified consultant along with the common formatting in supporting documents, there are serious concerns that the employment history of the applicant has been misrepresented. Application forwarded to DIPM for further assessment."
Among all 4 points mentioned by them, i have only the first one, the address. Now can someone put some light on it? any other member of the forum having the same problem???
Actually, I wrote several times regarding this issue. I also mentioned that they are keeping aside all applications in a group who applied through unauthorized agents.
As it is a huge chunk of applications, VO may not take any serious decision instead of taking further verification.
They may do :
1. Site verification
2. Explanation request why you used unauthorized agent.
May be they would request to CHC, Dhaka for further verification about these agents before taking any unexpected steps.
According to these unauthorized agents:
They submitted lots of applications before and got success. And they did the same for FSW 2014 applicants.
But SGVO's work pattern may be changed and they are strict on proper documentation nowadays. Thats why this unexpected scenario happened. However, it doesn't make any sense why they are using their address as mailing address and same type of JD.
I know some applicants who used agents but they use applicants' individual mailing address and JD. So, VO cant doubt on those as these applications are as like individual applications and it is very logical.
To whom it may concern:
Would you please check it with FSW2013 applicants? Is there anything happened before with 2013 applicants? I believe they processed applications and did the same for 2013 applicants.
You can compare it yourself to analyze the scenarios. I hope you will get positive answer.
So, what has to happen, is happened. You cant do anything from your side before getting any response from VO.
Just keep patience and wait for the outcome. Pray to
Almighty ALLAH(The Most Beneficent and Merciful) for the best outcome.
;D
