Did not see any after searching through the forum. But uncle_smile unfortunately got refused after he submitted some docs undisclosed in the forum. But also it turned out his application was carelessly prepared by his agent.KaydenB said:
According to Uncle_Smile's GCMS notes, seems like it has more to do with "incorrect NOC listed".u2cc said:
I hate to say that I've seen a case (can't remember in which thread) where it got rejected even after Schedule A submitted - reason was either NOC doesn't match the duties, or the job offer didn't satisfy the officer that it is for a permanent job!!!KaydenB said:
Thanks for bringing this up! It is this very thread!AAlhadka said:
On the safe side, I already know my NOC matches and that my PR application required no job offerAAlhadka said:
Good for you! I was requested Schedule A for my spouse too despite no changes of any of the information provided - anyway, when was your schedule A requested or submitted?KaydenB said:On the safe side, I already know my NOC matches and that my PR application required no job offer
At this point, it's either they're gonna like what they see or not
The Schedule A was for my spouse, I was not required any additional documents.
My spouse got requested Schedule A because of a legal change in first name (which was acknowledged by CIC and is not a problem for them, as long as all important changes are declared before PR issuance).
Yeah, saw that one as well. It was problem with the job offer, I think it somehow read that it was for 3 years even though it was supposed to permanent. The good news is that it's the only one I've seen on the forum.AAlhadka said:
Yeah, I know the feeling. On one hand, I'm happy for everyone who has finally gotten some moment on their PRs, just very frustrated and a bit jealous I've heard nothing.nuno1313 said:
