Hello,
I wanted to get some initial reactions from folks who've been through this process on my GCMS notes below. They do not look very positive to me.
Please read this for additional context:
My Express entry profile score was 451 based on education and work exp. I received ITA on JUNE 1 2018
After ITA Submission, my score was 481 as my Maternal Uncle resides in Canada. I submitted my ITA on July 24 2018.
Here are my 3 points of concern -
1. Funds - While I have provided funds, my bank would not sign the document and would only get it notarized. So my letter is not signed but it is notarized. In the notes below it says Funds-Appears met, but in the last section of the notes, it also calls out that it doesn't have a signature but is notarized. Also, i opened y bank account 7 months before ITA but have maintained a balance more than how much i require for EE since that date.- Is this a cause for concern ?
2. Filiation with Uncle - When I got my document checklist, it only asked for proof of relationship and didn't ask for proof of rsidence and I was informed to not provide documents they didn't ask for
Also, my initial score (451) for getting ITA did not include points for filiation with uncle. Does it matter if I don't get these points ? so instead of 481 it goes back to 451 and I had received the ITA for 451.
3. Statutory Questions: I had a denied Tourist Visa in 2013 (apparently because my Family Form was incomplete) to Canada which I had already declared in the Statutory Question (which is what the note is referring to in the Potential Adverse Info Note - I was being as upfront as I could with my Tourist Visa Denial ) - Is this a cause for concern.
These are the Analyst Notes :
RECOMMENDATION: Review Required MI3 SUMMARY NOTES: -CRIMINALITY: CIO RECOMMENDED REVIEW REQUIRED FOR STATUTORY QUESTION -PROOF OF FUNDS: EDOC#XXXXXXXXX, NO SIGNATURE ON DOCUMENT, DATE OF ACCOUNT OPENING - 2017 DECEMBER. -QUALIFIED PERSON IN CANADA: UNCLE NO PROOF OF CANADIAN ADDRESS PROVIDED. A11.2 APPEARS MET R75: FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS - APPEARS MET R76: SELECTION CRITERIA - FSW POINTS/Funds: Appears met FSW POINTS Total: 70 READY TO FINALIZE RPRF: COMPLETE
POTENTIAL ADVERSE INFORMATION: NOTE: -CRIMINALITY: CIO RECOMMEND REVIEW REQUIRED FOR STATUTORY QUESTION: [REFUSED ADMISSION DETAILS] I WAS REFUSED A VISITOR VISA IN CANADA IN 2013 DUE TO INSUFFICIENT DOCUMENTS/MISSED SIGNATURE. I WAS ALSO REFUSED A TOURIST VISA TO THE US ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO BECAUSE I WAS NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTS PER THEIR REQUEST.
ADAPTABILITY: 0 FSW POINTS IS RELATED TO A QUALIFYING CANADIAN PERSON. PA PROVIDED COPY OF PROOF OF FILIATION TO MATERNAL UNCLE CONFIRMED WITH BC. NO PROOF OF CANADIAN RESIDENCE PROVIDED. POINTS NOT ATTRIBUTED.
SETTLEMENT FUNDS: Appears to meet approx XXXXXX per statement dated XXXXX. PA PROVIDED A SUMMARY OF 2 ACCOUNTS. NO HISTORY OF FUNDS PROVIDED. ACCOUNT OPENING DATE 2017/12/22. LETTER IS NOT SIGNED BY BANK OFFICIAL. LETTER WAS STAMPED BY PUBLIC NOTARY.
Thank you very much ! Any help is appreciated. Feedback, even if negative is appreciated