[quote author=
Young and Brightest Citations:-
1)
"Hon. Claude Carignan (Leader of the Government):Senator, as
you said, we are committed to promoting francophone
immigration across Canada through our permanent
immigration program. Starting on January 1, applications are
to be processed in six months or less, under the Express Entry
program, as you said. It is my understanding that the minister has
taken part in numerous consultations to see how we can attract
the best and brightest francophone immigrants, which will help
Canada meet its workforce and economic needs"
2)
"The Government believes Canada can and should compete actively to attract the best and brightest newcomers to resettle here. That's why we are getting set to treat most immigration applications in a revolutionary new way."
3)
"Our government has made it a priority to enhance Canada's economic immigration system. After years of mismanagement under previous governments, we have cleaned up backlogs and introduced important new programs to better recognize foreign credentials, and attract the very best and brightest to our country."
Peter Mackay is an MP.
Now, nobody is envious of other people getting ITAs.
So if 600 points allows you to sidestep the language testing and education credential assessment, then how do you know where does their education and English proficiency stand? Simply age and one year of Canadian experience gives you enough points to score 135 easily. Just by having a job is the answer which throws the subjective assessment of CRS to the wind.
Look at the LMO stats, and tell me what skilled work do you find there at all. :-
Just a look at the LMO stats will tell you about the 735 score in itself. It is not skilled, but cheap work. Now LMOs should not be discriminated against in EE, but does it not encourage more cheap labor instead? Especially in industries where TFWs were eliminated.
[/quote]
None of your quotes refer to age. It might suit your interests to imagine that people in their 40s are a useless burden on society and have no value to add to Canada. However there are some jobs where having 20 years experience makes you valuable to an employer and skilled at your job - hence applicants having the job offer without education points (as pointed out previously, probably because they didn't need to apply for ECA).
Young and Brightest Citations:-
1)
"Hon. Claude Carignan (Leader of the Government):Senator, as
you said, we are committed to promoting francophone
immigration across Canada through our permanent
immigration program. Starting on January 1, applications are
to be processed in six months or less, under the Express Entry
program, as you said. It is my understanding that the minister has
taken part in numerous consultations to see how we can attract
the best and brightest francophone immigrants, which will help
Canada meet its workforce and economic needs"
2)
"The Government believes Canada can and should compete actively to attract the best and brightest newcomers to resettle here. That's why we are getting set to treat most immigration applications in a revolutionary new way."
3)
"Our government has made it a priority to enhance Canada's economic immigration system. After years of mismanagement under previous governments, we have cleaned up backlogs and introduced important new programs to better recognize foreign credentials, and attract the very best and brightest to our country."
Peter Mackay is an MP.
Now, nobody is envious of other people getting ITAs.
So if 600 points allows you to sidestep the language testing and education credential assessment, then how do you know where does their education and English proficiency stand? Simply age and one year of Canadian experience gives you enough points to score 135 easily. Just by having a job is the answer which throws the subjective assessment of CRS to the wind.
Look at the LMO stats, and tell me what skilled work do you find there at all. :-
Just a look at the LMO stats will tell you about the 735 score in itself. It is not skilled, but cheap work. Now LMOs should not be discriminated against in EE, but does it not encourage more cheap labor instead? Especially in industries where TFWs were eliminated.
[/quote]
None of your quotes refer to age. It might suit your interests to imagine that people in their 40s are a useless burden on society and have no value to add to Canada. However there are some jobs where having 20 years experience makes you valuable to an employer and skilled at your job - hence applicants having the job offer without education points (as pointed out previously, probably because they didn't need to apply for ECA).
