Hi
@Scorpman21,
First of all thank you so much for sharing your GCMS information, it was very very useful. I am glad to tell you that my friend and you have same due dates. Its 27th September!
Most Welcome Buddy. Good to know that we have similar due date & I really hope Ndvo adheres to this date.
Sharing GCMS information with
@Cynicalmonk,
@Scorpman21 and all others, hope this is useful.
We received the notes on Saturday. And here is what the main details were-
1) Next due date is 27th September.
2) R10 and criminality were passed on 14th July (the day BGC went NA2)
2) File was sent to NDVO on 24th August
3) Eligibility was Met at NDVO on 23rd August, the same date documents changed to "not needed".
Eligibility went from first "not started" to "calculation" then to "review required" then to "met" on the same day i.e 23rd August.
#Are your sure you see this "Met" status at Ndvo. In my notes, "Met" is at CIO & it says "Not Started" as the New Value & "Met" as the old value at Ndvo. Please check and confirm.#
Some other details I would confirm is that all our speculations for IP1 etc. were founded to be correct, IP1 begins the day they start checking R10 and is NA the day criminality and R10 are passed.
#Yes, the speculations all proved to be true.#
if you wish to ask any further details. please, I would be happy to share.
I do have few of my questions regarding GCMS if anyone would have some insight to-
a) On
page 4 of the notes there is mentioned
"Counterfoil required: YES" (this is in Client details section),
is this normal or something to worry?, what does this means?
# Don't really know what it means. But nothing to worry, and it is common in all the notes I have seen. #
b) On
page 41 there is something mentioned as
"item requested (1)- kit, application form" (in correspondence section). W
e received no request for anything, what does this means?
#Same as mine.#
c)
The most serious question, like I mentioned the Eligibility went from "not started" to "calculation in progress" to "review required" and the to "met" on the same day. I am extremely worried that to do all of you got this or was the "review required" some anomaly that they checked and then changed to met, is this something to be worried about and take action for??
#Nothing to worry. This is the standard process for the file to move further.#
Like on page 58 of GCMS Eligibility goes as- met, old- review required, old- calculation in progress, old- not started.
THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION- I have underlined the doubtful and worriesome part in red in the below text, rest all written in black is exactly as from my GCMS. (Though lines do not finsh where they finished in the original, i don't think that'll make a difference lol)
Under Notes 5 at the end under NOTES, on page 75 under the label EE Eligibility,
It says,
Text
REVIEW TYPE: Program assistant APPLICATION #E00000000 REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this file based on the documents submitted by the applicant and information contained in the file and note the following. MIN SCORE: 415 CRS SCORE: 446 Principal applicant application promoted: Existing UCI Review Notes for representative: Has Representative Rep Number:XYXZX Rep info: John Doe Primary Applicant Medical attached to UCI: Yes Client fees: Verified---- LANGUAGES----- Principal Applicant 1-English-IELTS and Met threshold and Verified----EDUCATION---- Primary Applicant 1 ECA report Verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential conformed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Bachelor's Degree (Four years) and postgraduate degree (one year) Foreign credential provided----- POLICE CERTIFICATE------ Primary Applicant 1- India police certificate provided R10 OK Recommendation: Review required------ AGE------- Applicants age reviewed and No change from ITA to e-APR Statutory details located in separate GCMS note.
Now my question is what is the meaning of this? Which review is required here? is it R10 or police Certificate or AGE?? This so confusing and worrying!! No commas etc to know which sentence finishes where!! Please anyone help me in this regard its super important!
What should be done to resolve this review, there is nothing else mentioned further about the review AFAIK????
#Yes, this one is something strange. When R10 is passed, why the review required. I suggest to seek @legalfalcon 's help on this one. (Sir please spare a few mins to resolve this one.)#
Another Important question regarding Eligibility only, at then end under NOTES and under Notes 1 and EE eligibilty label, under Agent review on page 75 it says- On based of docs provided and information contained in application"A11.2 decision: Met 75(2), FSW Minimum Requirements: Appears met 76(1)(a), Selection criteria FSW points: Appears met FSW points: 69 Comprehensive ranking system at ITA: 446 Current CRS Score:446 I have reviewd information and documents for the CRS points for the following: PA Awarded points as single at ITA and APR PA awarded points for 1 year Foreign work experience with xyz company, PA awarded pints for Bachelor and post grad diploma, Primary NOC: 2122 with xyz company Submitted reference letter confirms applicants employment throughout specified period and describes duties which are consistent with skill level A NOC. Reference letter confirms full time employment. eDoc. 12345678.
#My notes in the end says, "Officer Please Review eDoc xxxxxx". @legalfalcon Is this normal & anything to worry or be prepared for".#
Now my question is that is this "apperas to met" the standard way or something is not sure here to them?? and is Met (75) and Met (76) standard and not signify anything specific??
#All appears to be fine here. Again nothing to worry & common in all the notes.#
I would highly appreciate inputs and advice.