Search results

Thank you for your reply. In this case, your illustration should be a cut off rule, and not a tie break rule. According to/quoting IRCC: Tie-breaking rule: December 31, 2017 at 12:14:21 UTC Tie-break: a means of deciding a winner from competitors who have tied. So, if this date is the tie...

Again, if the oldest profile on 441 (31/12/17) is ranked higher, the only way it can occupy the 3750th position is if it is the only profile on 441 for that draw - and the 3749th profile is 442 - therefore no need for a tie breaker.

True, so if the oldest profile on 441 (31/12/17) is ranked higher, the only way it can occupy the 3750th position is if it is the only profile on 441 for that draw - and the 3749th profile is 442 - therefore no need for a tie breaker.

Thank you @abhishek_89. How about this: For the 25/07/18 draw. Cut off: 441 So called tie-breaking date: 31/12/17 Draw size: 3750 Assuming 3700 scored 442+, and 55 candidates on 441 (50 slots left to fill). According to IRCC: If more than one candidate has the lowest score, the cut-off is...

Thank you for this. Please consider this assumption: For the 25/07/18 draw. Cut off: 441 So called tie-breaking date: 31/12/17 Draw size: 3750 Assuming 3700 scored 442+, and 55 candidates on 441 Tie-breaking rule implies: from oldest profile to the latest profile with a stop at the fixed draw...

until that person shows up, it remains a theory. As far as the numbers go, it's yet to be disproven!

It's the key to almost accurate projections. From all indications so far, the theory appears true.

Exactly why I'm asking everyone. Some draws past, there was someone. I couldn't validate these claims though.

@hope2018, @georgedac So, the tie breaking date and time (31/12/17) does not necessarily mean no ITA recipients after this date with the same lowest score, as a lot of people assume, hence the hypothesis.

So, how do you reconcile this with the so called tie-breaking date and time?

The numbers are not adding up. IRCC's statements if reconsidered supports the 1st theory: * The highest ranked candidates are invited during rounds of invitations. If we issue 3,500 invitations during a round, the system will pick the top 3,500 candidates at that time. The cut-off for the round...

The date of the tie breaking rule might imply the profile entry date and time for the lowest ranking candidate for that particular draw. Therefore, this does not necessarily mean that nobody after the tie breaking date and time got ITAs: More debate and input needed here. So, if you're reading...

There seeming plan this year is to rather have a 3 week draw delay, to maintain their bi weekly draw cycle, rather than a back to back draw which would provide succour to a lot of us here. No harm hoping for a surprise draw tomorrow though with a 4000 to 4250 draw size.

Interesting, didn't know we were thinking along the same line, means I rushed into conclusion then. From which application....is the issue. For now, maybe he's busy preparing for his flight to Canada. Let's hope he remembers the 'helpless' people he left on this forum, and returns to clarify...

I hope CIC is not planning a 3 week delay sometime soon/in September to maintain the baseless biweekly draw cycle. If this is the case, I suggest tomorrow would be a rational time for a back to back draw to minimise/counter the dastardly effects of the 'supposed' upcoming draw delay (although...

He only said he got ppr... Hi. Got my ppr everyone. Sorry for the delay in updating you...This statement does not mean he got ppr from that particular application. He is yet to answer my question on how he went about it if that was the case. So, you should ask him too before rushing into...

Congratulations! Does that mean if someone is lucky and the system does not deduct the points, and ITA is issued, we can accept the ITA, and proceed with application? If that's the case, did you write an LOE for this situation?

Going deeper into the pool for talents might be responsible for/in line with recent PNP invitation trends veering away from the traditional express entry pool towards french speakers only (some got invites from OINP as recently as last week), people with education/family relation ties to Canada...

Thank you for this. So, what if the draw size remains 3750 for some strange reason?

Congratulations! You are very brave. Does that mean if someone is lucky and the system does not deduct the points, and ITA is issued, we can accept the ITA, and proceed with application? If that's the case, did you write an LOE for this situation?