Search results

The good thing is that Intend to reside clause will be removed on Royal Ascent, which I have pretty realistic expectations that will happen before the summer recess of the Parliament. If there is no Royal Ascent before the summer recess then I have to apply with effective Intend to reside...

What do you mean heeradeepak? Sorry I don't understand your statement.

My biggest concern is to apply before the big flood. Which is guaranteed that will happen. And I am pretty aware that minimum 20% from all applications will face delays. CIC just works that way. No mandatory deadlines for CIC to follow. I mean that the CIC is not working efficiently so no...

The Conservatives proposed amendments to hold Bill C-6 for 5 years on the last Committee meeting, But it didn't pass because the Liberals have majority there. The problem have always been what will happen at the Senate, because the Liberals don't have full control there. And once again the same...

I fully support Bill C-6 because it will remove the Intend to reside clause when the Royal Ascent is given. About the rest of the provisions I am relaxed , because they will come into force later on, hence the big flood is not expected any time soon.

The Conservatives are trying to amend Bill C-24 to be effective minimum 5 years before any revisions, that didn't pass at the Committee because the Liberals has full control there, but at the Senate is the exact opposite. The Liberals don't have full control in the Senate. It is likely the...

Harper and Kenney can influence the Senate which has Conservative majority. The Minister also expressed his concerns about the Senate at the first meeting of the Committee.

The Conservatives had the majority in all the chambers and Bill C-24 was approved without any amendments in 2014. The situation now at the Senate will be tricky because they might push back the Bill for more amendments in the Commons, if they start to do that (which is pretty possible) this...

There is not much time before the summer recess. From now on, they really need to hurry up with the remaining steps. They basically have couple of weeks left. The Senate is the key factor as of whether this Bill will be ready next month or it will get delayed.

Just for comparison. The Conservatives were pushing Bill C-24 very hard and it was done at the Committee stage for 8 days back in 2014. Now the same stage for Bill C-6 took One month and a half.

Hopefully CIC understood that the RQs are only beneficial for the scammers.

Unfortunately at the Senate there is not only first second and third readings. There is also a pre-study meetings on top which will be ~ 4 pre-study meetings. So the whole Senate stage is likely to be ~7 meetings in total before the final third reading.

There is no mandatory deadlines for citizenship applications, some people who have applied in 2010-2011 are still waiting.

There is no way to deal with subjectivity. You can see the practical results from this... one question, forces different advises contradicting each other coming from different sources. And those sources are giving the right advices according to their point of view. All that is because there is...

Frankly when so many of us can't accurately predict the actions from CIC, particularly that two different officers might impose different processing criteria , that means that there is simply no such thing as mandatory processing standards in CIC. In that sense different sources of information...

I was referencing to Canadiandesi2006 regarding the question from Exports...

On the other hand the line for the CJ hearing is pretty possible to be likely long due to the influx of shortfall applications because of the current Bill C-24.

Exports you might want to look again this scenario and how CIC is messing up when more than once have been applied. http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/citizenship-not-approved-t409689.0.html

Canadiandesi2006 is in the same situation. Withdraw and reapplied and again experience delays (still waiting for the test while many from September October are waiting for their Oaths, some of them are already done) So the chances are that a delay might happen again. Ambient2 also don't want to...

I remember that this 80% -20% standard have been there for a long time. The message was something like "80% of the applications have been processed within ... months" which means that always minimum 20% will face delays. Both things are interrelated. Once they cannot process an application on...