Search results

@cocknbull Hi buddy, how ya doin? how to extract info which has been exempted from release under section 16(b) in caips/gcms under access to information act(ati)? plz thro some light if u have an idea abt it. thx, tc.

buddy, this was my basic concern, when we upload caips, smtms due to lack of proper knowledge we upload some basic info such as our file num , names , surname etc. plz take gud care, my first n last submission.

@mandie sorry buddy, I mis-took u. @everyone codes will fetch u basic info for instance what paper selection decision is, findec code(final decision code) etc, but still thrz enf info which cant be encoded without experts. plz mark my words, its smthn like if u read ur caips 100 times, 100...

even im in dat favour buddy. hope everything is clear.

buddy, watever i said is on the basis of solid knowledge and experience. tho I am not an expert, one can bypass, if not like my opinion.

absolutely. look, if one's case is rejected under section 40(a) or something & the case not has been challenged in federal court, then I may approve it because it cud be helpful of others. I am thankful to the guy who showed faith in me, n I will to try help him to the maximum extent. thx.

Mandie very mean of u, how cud u ask him to public his caips. very sad indeed.

alrite mail me at common_cyber@yahoo.com

I second kunwar11.

look bf'd mean bring forward date; its related to the internal functioning of cic, no body can predict anything by knowing bfd, its a time counter which specifies that the visa officer will open ur file on the given that. wat else?

ya tell, watz the prob?

never go for a consultant, it will unnecesarry intricate the matter. They know nothing but charge very high; what for; just to create probs for u, nothing else. do ur home work, do everything by urself. god bless.

numbers wont alter the fact, whether u r alone or group. u can fight against CIC if u can prove there is a breach of procedure fairness in simple words if u can prove them wrong by taking out some mistake. judges give high deference to VO's decision n generally they dont intervene unless they...

never mind, lets stand united n atleast we can assure each other that watever we will say or do shall be for the benifit for all of us in the due course. one more thing plz, dont get offended, apology ought to be asked in a humble manner. god bless all.

u r rite pal, its only the BEARER know the pain. @ kavya, this is not the time to show people , how mentally strong u r n wat ur plans are; rather solace ought to be forwarded the ones who suffered. heights of insenstivity. hypocryte approach.

@ parhar ji, plz check ur inbox. thx.

As we all must be knowing the latest update of CIC i.e removal of pre-feb 2008 applicants, is a very sad newz indeed. I forward my heartiest condolence to the ones who suffered. It's only the bearer knows the intensity of the pain. one more thing to all fellow members we ought to be togather...

dnt mind it but its a bit selfish on ur part to mention that its abt pre feb 2008, we already know that. watz the point mentioning that EXPLICITLY. at the same time, we sudnt curse CIC as well, i have seen many ppl who are cursing the minister for this, its a change in their internal policy...

thx kanemen my old buddy. u knw wat, I wrote a detailed process of judicial review here, its pros n cons, but no body gave it a damn. I modified the entire msg n wrote god bless all, atleast I found u 2 reply, ha ha. anyways buddy howz e/t?