Search results

So my question if they found in their manual review on or before 30th Nov. 2012 and than entered points with status "Decision Made" than "Finance does not return fees in error for those applications where it is determined a selection decision was in fact made, but where CAIPS/GCMS data did not...

Mine status also now shows DM (just within three days) I am 2005 applicant and litigant so your point is good. As if a decision has been made we are not entitled to refund of fee like others ;D hope for the best early January 2013.

I am in process to get latest CAIPS notes as my status recently shows "Decision Made" in order to check the actual reason i.e. positive or negative, so members please share if they recently applied and got any detail about it. I am July 2005 applicant and joined litigation in August 2012...

Dear Members: As my status now changed and shows "Decision Made" I am in process to obtain copy of CAIPS notes in order to get what base on this decision, however, as it normally will take one month, I ask other members to let us know if they recently got their CAIPS and that shows "Decision Made".

What we see the status of litigants is now shows "decision made". So we need input of non litigants status what it shown in their cases same like before I.e. "in process" ? If yes that will be Clear progress in our Managed Litigation.

I think The cross examin has to be completed on or before 7 January, so it is normal. This also apply to one lead case of Tim. So don't worry.

Yes it is about pre Feb 27, 2008 applicnats, this FSW 1, 2 & will be next attraction (A sequal of Horrar movie produced and directed by Kenny) LOL

Do not worry I am also litigant of Mario Bellissimo and my status also shown now "Decision Made" so wait and see for next hearing.

Dear Members: Now if any one want to join beware that only Tim have two fee i.e. an application fee and a wining fee applicable (490 + 1500 approx.) upon wining, whereas no other lawyer has any kind to wining fee. So better to join any other lawyer. Now I think Tim has to cancel the booking of...

We the outsiders appealing to let us enter become fun for everyone first by CIC who keep us waiting and their few brain cells activate after eight that they cannot process our files, second by Top immigration lawyers of Canada who claim that they have extra brain cells and thrid by Canadian...

I think Preet Deep Singh case will be lead case only for Tim from his four different lead cases as Justice allowed him to argue only one lead case like other lawyers. So all other lawyers will have each lead case for them separately.

unfairCIC.con will be arguing in the Federal Court in Vancouver and Toronto for an injunction, baring CIC from introducing legislation to abolish the investor litigant's file unless the Court knuckles under to DoJ counsel's objection to allowing the injunction to be heard in Vancouver.

Dear Members: I am afraid also that after we win from this we have to file another case for "Mandamus" against CIC to process our cases and finalized them. As the ruling in our favor will be only for Section 87.1 that it is against natural justice and against IRPA. Therefore, next time we all...

I fully agree with Bcone and Gaber1 that if Tim keep his applicants as it is it may lead to a judgement and an easier approach to Justice, however, Tim has open his shop for business on his partial ruling to make him rich, now in current suitation judge allow him to only present one lead case...

Dear Members: Any one has any idea what is the reason for changing the lead file, our lawyers keep changing theie lead file time to time. One more thing, it is important or I should wish to be a lead file of any lawyer and why ?

I remember in earlier case decision on TIM case the court says that he can not rule of the law with is only a proposal, as TIM raise this question that if that law passed the files will be terminated. Now what will be, when the law passed there must be some sort of relief and I think that, it...

Dear Tuyen: I really miss you, where have you been over last eight years when CIC was sitting on our file if you let us know at that time that do not trust cic or wait, now why so hurry to let all of us know that what we did (trust) on CIC we were fool and we should have second options etc...

We always positive and i do not know why you think so negative as we have now nothing to lose if we do not challange like others.

Dear Members: I will be way during three or four days (very busy) therefore will not follow positng, will get back and see the good results upon my return.

I found it while searching for other cases of same nature on court webiste and thier hearing dates, however, it looks to me that it is an imdependent one with some similar suitation like us (The only possibility that if the applicant received any kind of refusal during process than it will be a...