+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Search results

  1. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    Interesting development. The full report, urging more transparency, is suddenly no longer available on the commissioner's website: Access at issue: Challenging the status quo (oic-ci.gc.ca) (See link at the bottom.) Is the IRCC fighting back? Don't want the sheeple to see too much...
  2. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    All of the above makes sense, but there is a lot more pointless stuff even beyond that. For example, the use of "non-routine" to justify apparent laziness, as in "that means we may take as long as we like". Now, consider the case of a fingerprint RCMP check, which is one of the reasons for a...
  3. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    All that may well be so. But you need to look at significant legal rulings in such matters. One of those involved a case where a person was denied citizenship because the view was that he was spending a lot of time abroad and merely wanted a "passport of convenience". The ruling by the high...
  4. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    Today's news has some important information from the relevant "watchdog": Watchdog says immigration applicants need easier access to info on their files (msn.com)
  5. M

    2020 applicants with Background verification- In Progress

    RE: " which one is pending security or criminality". He should be able to get that from GCMS notes on his own. I doubt that the MP is going to getting more information beyond that level.
  6. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    Very useful and interesting information! What has IRCC been doing to improve things? Apparently not much. In the file you have provided you will find an amazing note stating that digitization of citizenship grant is not a priority, and, also amazingly stated is that contrary to what we...
  7. M

    Citizenship test: Collective action required, or expect endless delays, years. Example of the effective lobbyng of people awaiting spousal sponsorship

    You are being silly. Who are these "ordinary users"? Members of the public? Well, ATIP seems to believe that the information they made available can be available to a member of the public. And, surely, ATIP knows better than you (a random "ordinary user") what can and what cannot be made...