Congratulations!!! and thanks for your reply.
I have a couple more questions:
1. Did you change your employer during the implied status period, or were not working? (I was not working at that time, that's why i'm confused)
2. Where did you choose (work permit, implied status, work permit) in the application form? there is no cells for such answers in the new form. May be you did your application online or using an old form!
2019 version of CIT 0002 included question 9.b) which asked if the applicant had TRV or Protected Person status before becoming a PR, and if the applicant checked the [yes] box the fillable pdf version gave a chart for filling in status/date obtained/date expired.
This is not included in the 2020 October version of CIT 0002 (which I believe is the form currently in use).
Information regarding time in Canada prior to becoming a PR, but within the five year eligibility period, is now entirely provided in the physical presence calculation.
CAUTION:
There is a tendency in this forum to assert that what someone reports they did without encountering any problems means it is OK to do it that way. There's are serious flaws in such reasoning. All it really means, for sure, is that it MIGHT be OK based on it was OK for at least the one or twenty who report it was OK for them.
Many times, and often that is many more times, there are reports of things not going OK for applicants in similar situations.
See my previous post above about being sure to WAIT to apply with a good buffer. And, when days based on implied status are involved, to
WAIT to apply with a buffer that is bigger than the number of days credit for days with implied status. Sure, some applicants will sail smoothly through the process without that much buffer. But many will not. It can vary and will vary considerably from person to person depending on a wide range of factors. In regards to implied status, for example, what the client's GCMS records show regarding dates of status can determine whether IRCC gives credit in the course of routine processing.
Of course, assuming the individual is correct about their implied status, technically the person had continuing TR status during that period of time. And should get the credit toward the citizenship physical presence requirement.
And a PR can force the issue, but that means non-routine processing and likely long delays.
This is not to suggest excluding those days with implied status. Those should be included, reported in the physical presence calculation. But apply with more than enough total credit to fully cover (and I suggest plus some) all those days . . . the reason is to avoid the RISK of
(1) the application being returned if GCMS does not show or indicate the applicant had implied status, AND
(2) to REDUCE the RISK of non-routine processing (especially RQ related non-routine processing) if there is any concern or doubt about the validity of the applicant's TR status during that period.
Again: some will be OK without waiting to have such a buffer. But the RISK otherwise is enough that the prudent applicant will wait. Waiting can mean taking the oath sooner.
For every report in this forum about things going fine for someone applying without waiting, there are many more reports from those who wished they waited, some whose application was returned, and many tales of woe about being bogged down in non-routine processing (many blaming IRCC, which does not get them to taking the oath any sooner).