What you need at the Port-of-Entry, to "enter Canada," is not nearly that strict.
Where is it said?
In other words, where is the guarantee at the LEGISLATIVE level (namely, the law) which states
"Permanent resident of Canada, whose application is considered " in process "( and he is a PR) - is GUARANTEED to receive a PRTD document from the Canadian Embassy to enter Canada."
And if the case is considered for 3 years..5 years?
And such delays are very common.
But there is no such resolution anywhere.
Where is the justice?
As I noted, I would make any further observations about this in a thread where it is not off-topic, not disruptive. So I am quoting the above post and responding here to avoid disrupting the timeline for processing topic.
There is no guarantee in the law or the regulations that a PR with a PR card application in process is "
GUARANTEED to receive a PRTD document from the Canadian Embassy to enter Canada."
On the contrary, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, in Section 31(2)(b), states that "
a person who is outside Canada and who does not present a status document indicating permanent resident status is presumed not to have permanent resident status."
See Section 31 IRPA here:
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-2.5/page-5.html#docCont
This presumption is subject to "
unless an officer determines otherwise . . . " Which means the presumption that a PR outside Canada without a valid PR card does NOT have valid PR status is rebuttable.
Which is why I have not been among those casually suggesting going abroad relying on getting a PR Travel Document in this situation.
As I cautioned back in October:
HOWEVER, if there are admissibility issues at stake in the PR card application, PR RO or otherwise, or other issues regarding the PR's status, those will be obvious in the PR's GCMS records and will be taken into consideration by the visa office abroad when it processes the PR TD application.
For a PR with no inadmissibility or status issues, clearly in compliance with the PR Residency Obligation, there is very low risk of a problem getting a PR TD.
There are indications that is NOT your daughter's situation, but rather that there is indeed a significant RISK (not for sure, but a risk) that IRCC sees a problem with her PR status. And when a visa office opens a PR TD application, they will indeed see that, and that will indeed have influence in what the visa office decides.
If your daughter was quite certain the only issue with her PRC application was RO compliance, and the fact she was NOT Eligible for a new PR card when the application was made, the risks involved in going abroad and relying on a PR TD to return to Canada would be fairly low. The timeline perhaps being the biggest drawback.
But I went to some pains back in October to illuminate cause for concern beyond RO compliance. As I have repeatedly noted, sure, it is possible this application is bogged down due to oversight, error, or neglect. BUT it is not only possible but appears likely enough there is a status-related problem, that there is a real risk of that, of a substantive issue in her case, it could be risky to go abroad and apply for a PR TD.
BUT EITHER WAY . . . the best approach is to see a lawyer. Or wait, staying in Canada in the meantime. Going abroad, even just to do a flagpole at a land border crossing with the U.S., might force more definitive action on her case, but that might not be the outcome she desires.
Which brings this to . . .
"But there is no such resolution anywhere.
Where is the justice?"
Canada is a rule of law country, very much so, among the top tier of countries which guarantee its citizens and residents what is called "
due process" in some jurisdictions, and what is referred to as "
procedural fairness" in Canadian law.
This is not a magical guarantee however. Rather, government is structured to provide mechanisms to enforce the right of procedural fairness. For your daughter, it appears the path to "
justice" requires employing a lawyer . . . which, as I have previously suggested, is first and foremost to help your daughter figure out what her status is, what issues or problems IRCC might have, to get the information needed to pursue the remedies the law provides, which hopefully is no more than clarifying some information for IRCC, but which might require adjudication, which requires a lawyer (people can litigate pro se, but that tends to be akin to doing surgery on oneself).
Or she can wait. Or she can take her chances at the border. And you can rail about how unfair IRCC is in the meantime. But the more prudent course now would be to see a lawyer and get help figuring out what is happening and what can be done to fix it.