I would like to know if there is a particular POE that is lenient in this regard? I just wonder why the immigration doesn't acknowledge the issue and come out with a statement on this. I believe a few other countries (Australia) are more relaxed on the RO due to the pandemic. Lastly how does one get to know if he /she gets reported and do I need to state the above facts that prevented me at the POE?
Thanks and regards.
Personally I think it's a waste of time to search for a more lenient POE - there's no obvious reported trend and if there were, probably would not remain so for long. More PRs with residency obligation issues enter through land borders - but that's partly (or perhaps entirely) explainable by fact that land border is only viable option for those without valid PR card or PRTD, i.e. those who can't practically enter by air and whose circumstances are not comparable to your case.
Far better to concentrate on the practical limitations of being out of compliance - first and foremost of which is that subsequent travel carries risk of issues on re-entry, and renewing PR card may need to wait until back in compliance (again, travel limitation being the main issue). Whatever lenience might be allowed at the time of this planned entry won't necessarily apply at the time of future entries. For some that need to travel a lot, that risk may be a serious problem.
Read other threads in this sub-forum for more detail - but if reported, formally, you will likely be notified of it in writing at border and given a time period to appeal (and admitted pending that appeal, meaning okay to live and work in Canada while that goes on, and appeals process is not fast). Exceptions where PRs reported and not aware of it are pretty rare.
Not in a position to compare what Australia has done with respect to residency requirements and the 'travel facility' during covid; while in some respects the residency frameworks are similar, there are lots of differences - but mostly, it's just not very productive to compare (to what end?). Bluntly, Canada's not going to change the legislation and the existing regime provides a lot of room for covid-related leniency.
"It is what it is", and it is already quite lenient in most respects, with some other non-comparable aspects like having a land border that arguably result in some additional flexibility.
Note that I've referred to 'leniency' whereas properly stated it would require some detailed discussion of terminology and the law and what humanitarian and compassionate considerations are and what they're for, as well as other capacity/discretion to not strictly enforce what regulations are in play. It's just easier to say leniency - but not necessarily accurate in that the discretion exercised by officials is to some degree mandated by law (they must take some factors into consideration, even if the law doesn't say they must waive enforcement) with some right of appeal/review by a quasi-independent body. There is a process, not just dictated outcomes. The point being, it's not just the border agent being 'nice' or generous, the law requires them to
consider these things (and being human they will take into consideration what happens and chance of success afterwards and the amount of work required, etc), and I'm just being lazy by putting it all under the loose term leniency.