Section 16 (2)(c) applied. Can someone give me some explanation?

[caipsnotes]

I have 16 2 c in my notes too and from what I understand, the way some information was extracted to be included in the GCMS notes has been retracted as it might contain some sensitive information that can be used by anyone to harm the government buildings in Canada or something like that. Doesn't affect the PR application itself, maybe @legalfalcon can elaborate more.

About 16(2)(c) see https://bit.ly/3i9iPjo

 

[Bella Wu]

Thanks for sharing, I thought 16 2 （c）is a kind of hide history section, Do you think itwill be a big issue in our case? I saw just only112 case for last year

 

[caipsnotes]

Thanks for sharing, I thought 16 2 （c）is a kind of hide history section, Do you think itwill be a big issue in our case? I saw just only112 case for last year

It's not a big issue, you can often get the info that IRCC is not disclosing from CBSA.

 

[seadrag0n]

It's not a big issue, you can often get the info that IRCC is not disclosing from CBSA.

In other places, I read that 16(2)(c) is related to potential damage to government buildings, how is that relevant to a PR application?

 

[caipsnotes]

In other places, I read that 16(2)(c) is related to potential damage to government buildings, how is that relevant to a PR application?

The exemption is related to the disclosure of the information process under the Access to Information Act. One read the Act in depth and about this section here https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/access-information-privacy/access-information/access-information-manual.html#cha11_4_5

 

[Bella Wu]

I don't have any IT background and I'm not involved in this. I don't know why IT is marked 16, 2 and C. Does it mean that we will be deeply adjusted? And looking at the link you posted, few people were flagged for this reason, more nervous

 

[legalfalcon]

I have 16 2 c in my notes too and from what I understand, the way some information was extracted to be included in the GCMS notes has been retracted as it might contain some sensitive information that can be used by anyone to harm the government buildings in Canada or something like that. Doesn't affect the PR application itself, maybe @legalfalcon can elaborate more.

See https://bit.ly/30tkXNg

 

[caipsnotes]

I don't have any IT background and I'm not involved in this. I don't know why IT is marked 16, 2 and C. Does it mean that we will be deeply adjusted? And looking at the link you posted, few people were flagged for this reason, more nervous

Short answer, use of 16(2)(c) is not a reason to worry about.