Fri, Sep 24, 1:34 PM - OntarioTime of email and province please ?
Fri, Sep 24, 1:34 PM - OntarioTime of email and province please ?
Means, are you going with option 2? No refund?Thats confusing one? I am following
Are you applying on your parents behalf? Can you sing in onto online portal?
Means, are you going with option 2? No refund?
If I can apply for only one parent instead of 2 since my income can only accommodate 1?Means, are you going with option 2? No refund?
You cannot apply for 1 parent as long as they are both alive and married. It was asked repeatly. Both parents needs to go through medical, police and background check. Picking who to sponsor and who not to is not an option. (Since one of your parent can apply to sponsor a spouse later on)If I can apply only one of my parent instead of both since my income for 2018 is a bit less than what is required for 5 persons.
Totally agree with youI expect a flurry of posts like the one above soon.
People claiming that they actually don't meet the LICO cut-offs AFTER they've been invited.
These guys totally don't realise that they've snatched the opportunity away from someone who probably had this.
I wish them the best, but certainly won't be helping them... and suggest no one else on the forum helps them either.
The rules are there for a level playing field & are made clear to every one right from the start.
This is the reason I suggest that people who are invited to apply, but then don't actually meet the criteria should be fined & barred for a certain period from applying again.
You are right mate this is just a beginning, you will see lots of posts like those.I expect a flurry of posts like the one above soon.
People claiming that they actually don't meet the LICO cut-offs AFTER they've been invited.
These guys totally don't realise that they've snatched the opportunity away from someone who probably had this.
I wish them the best, but certainly won't be helping them... and suggest no one else on the forum helps them either.
The rules are there for a level playing field & are made clear to every one right from the start.
This is the reason I suggest that people who are invited to apply, but then don't actually meet the criteria should be fined & barred for a certain period from applying again.
IRCC is aware of this flaw and they clearly said their is not way to identify such application in advanceYou are right mate this is just a beginning, you will see lots of posts like those.
IRCC should come up with something very aggressive to stop this, not sure why people are just applying on the basis of hope and not meeting the requirements while they fully understand them.
But still it’s there should be some though action in place such as banning to apply for few years if sponsor is not meeting income requirements specifically, because this is so basic to understand.IRCC is aware of this flaw and they clearly said their is not way to identify such application in advance
so they are going to invite enough application so that effective invitation will be approx 30K , which means it might be around 33-35 K
Yes , Totally agree with you . IRCC need to ban such kind of people .But still it’s there should be some though action in place such as banning to apply for few years if sponsor is not meeting income requirements specifically, because this is so basic to understand.