Please, lets only focus on getting information about legal filing options, fees, lawyer contact etc. Lets not deviate from the core topic, just only on this thread.
The problem with that is the topic appears to mostly be about pursuing a group mandamus action. There does NOT appear to be any basis at all for such an action. The information available about "
legal filing options" is rather simple and straight-forward,
there are NONE for group mandamus.
That does NOT mean the door is closed for pursuing organized advocacy, as a group, which does not necessarily require lawyers, although lawyers can be and often are a good resource for group or organized advocacy.
Nor does the absence of a viable group action for mandamus necessarily close the door on pursuing other legal recourse, including other judicial remedies, for which the services of qualified lawyers is needed (while individuals can pursue judicial actions on their own behalf without a lawyer,
pro se, my understanding is that a group or organization must be represented by a licensed attorney). I am no expert, so I do not know what other legal recourse, what other judicial remedies might be available for a "group" in this situation. Even though so far I have seen no hint of a viable cause of action, without something more definitive on the table the door should be open to learn if there is any.
And, finally, the third leg of alternative options, that is approaches that do not rely on or involve some fantasy of group mandamus, there is
the option of seeking mandamus relief individually.
As for the prospect of seeking mandamus relief individually:
Frankly, in the current situation, in situations reported by prospective claimants in the forum, it does not appear that many, if any, are good candidates for pursuing a successful application for a writ of mandamus, remembering that the length of time IRCC has had an application is NOT, not alone, a sufficient basis for mandamus relief -- the Minister does NOT have a "clear duty" to complete citizenship application processing within any particular time. Look at the timelines in just the handful of cases referenced by
@cobie2 (posted evening September 7), NONE of whom were successful in obtaining mandamus relief, ALL delayed for more than FOUR years. In the case involving a citizenship application
pending for MORE than a DECADE a semblance of relief was granted, Justice McHaffie ordering periodic status reports.
This probably explains, at least in part, why there is not an overwhelming response among citizenship applicants, or for that matter, not much enthusiasm for investing real time, effort, and money into paying for lawyers to pursue mandamus relief. Betting odds are, well, discouraging.
A lot more could be said about the viability of INDIVIDUAL actions seeking mandamus relief, noting however that this has been discussed in some depth in many topics here. For purposes of this particular topic, mostly focused on group action rather than individual lawsuits, some general observations may be warranted:
-- even though there is no prospect for a group mandamus action, members of a group can benefit from identifying particular lawyers who will be better prepared to offer good advice, and if appropriate representation; the more similar cases lawyers handle, the more experienced and knowledgeable the lawyers tend to be about those kinds of cases, and thus, for example, in addition to being better prepared to advise and represent individuals in those situations, the less additional research the lawyer should need to do, which should reduce at least some of the expense
-- -- as I have noted in other discussions, given the procedural complexities of mandamus actions in conjunction with the extraordinary nature of the action, even among lawyers expertise in this area is NOT common, so finding a lawyer or group of lawyers with experience and expertise in this relative to citizenship applications is a practical necessity . . . and a group organized for advocacy can also be a group assisting its members in connecting with experienced, more likely to be effective lawyers
-- apart from any particular individual electing to invest in
lawyering-up to pursue mandamus, a very personal decision, any effort to encourage or solicit others to join should be tempered with realistic expectations; while
@canuck78 already addressed quite a few aspects in this vein (but as is all too common here, much of that has been taken out of context, or outright distorted . . . for those interested in learning more and figuring out how to navigate this stuff, better to read those observations looking for what you can learn from them rather than looking for reasons to criticize), it warrants highlighting some
realistic expectations:
-- -- the timeline for actually getting relief through an action seeking a writ of mandamus, in the context of a grant citizenship application, and especially in the current still-laboring-under-the-pandemic-cloud environment, is NOT likely to accelerate when a particular individual actually gets to take the oath (fact that many engage in pursuing actions, however, might be a factor in encouraging IRCC to accelerate things generally, or so one should hope)
-- -- cost is a big factor for anyone who has to ask how much will it cost; these actions tend to be EXPENSIVE and recovering costs from the government is at best a long-shot, and even if that happens, what is actually recovered tends to be a small slice of the actual costs
OVERALL: apart from being proactive or engaging in advocacy (there are many ways of doing this), it should be cautioned that, unfortunately, the prospects of accelerating the timeline through mandamus or other judicial action appear rather DIM, at best. I do not discourage anyone from pursuing long-shots. Those willing to do so often benefit others who are not equipped to bet against long odds. I do, however, strongly encourage full disclosure and honest advocacy. There is little promise of getting to the oath sooner here. No one should be confused let alone deceived about this. That is, those doing this are more likely to be doing it for the greater good, with not much promise, if any, it will mean that they personally get a Canadian passport much if at all sooner.