D
Deleted member 1050918
Guest
Indeed, FSW ITAs from 2020 and 2021 were just a backup plan. And yes, it was very unprofessional and kind of cruel to put those people into void for such a long time. Hence the recent official word stating IRCC's plan to be more "responsive" in the future. That was sort of an apology if you ask me.They also were well short of meeting last year’s target; so they’ll definitely not only look towards meeting this year’s quota but also exceed it by a margin.
It seems IRCC kept FSW on hold as an insurance/backup plan to meet the yearly target. This is understandable but what’s not cool is keeping these people in the dark with absolutely no information
About the gap remaining from last year's target; I'm not sure if they can just carry it over into 2021 to extend the quota, and I'm not sure if it would make things any better because IRCC still has the risk of not meeting 2021 targets alone, let alone the gap that may be added from 2020. I think they'll revise the immigration levels of 2023 and add all gaps into that quota. It'll be the best year for immigration, increased quotas, little to no covid, good economy.