Has any Montreal applicant been invited to online citizenship test?
- Thread starter kazawi
- Start date
Thank you for your feedback seems that most online test invitation are for applicant in GTA area,, i don't know what is going on with montreal local office
Well unfortunately the cic Montreal or Quebec agents prefer to process the application of french speaking applicants faster or as priority, this is Quebec rule. They want more french speaking as citizens or PR than Anglophones.
Is this really true that Montreal CIC agents prefer French applications over English applications? What is your source?
I cannot give you the source but I can confirm this is what is happening in the backend of Montreal CIC office.If you are an Anglophone or from any other province who only speaks english will guranteed :-
1) Be called for an interview and will be asked the toughest questions possible. ( They wanna give you hard time )
2) They will put your application on further review
3) They will keep your application for atleast 21 months then call for oath.
4)Right now with the current Quebec Govt they want french majority, even they passed a bill that only those people who speak French can apply for immigration through Quebec.
for further information you can check with people who recently had their decision made or virtual oath. They all speak French or are Billingual .
Unless you have actual elements to back those highly doubtful claims, please refrain from making them...
I can assure you what i am claiming is true. Agents/ officers working in montreal are pro french.
You think the officers working there were hired from Ontario or west coast ? If you don't wanna believe that's your call . It may be federal but federal has no control over Quebec offices. Dont you think processing would be the same in Quebec as other provinces ? Quebec is a different story .
Je suis bilingue, mais je préfère anglais car c'est ma langue natale. Malheureusement, il n'y avait pas d'éspace à mentionner dans l'application
Even then, extraordinary claims (which yours is) requires extraordinary evidence.