Not all cases are here on this forum and public forum. You will write thiese big paragraps but would not answer simple question.
1)When his application is under process how can you quote rights of mobility of PR on his case ???
2)Why it is a good idea to move to the province for which one has clearly agreed on application that he/she has no intention to live in that province.
Your advise can jeopardize someone's PR application and my so called fear mongering is actually a smart advise especially when PR application is under process.
And do not selectively quote me, I also mentioned that its not about Can You move. It is about should you move. It is about someone's entire career that relies on PR application and you're clearly saying that its okey to move to Quebec after stating on your application about no intention to live in Quebec because after PR you will be given those rights. What a joke
My response was to you and not to OP.
My response to OP is in the above posts for your leisure reading.
#521 ,
#526 , and
#525 which are self explanatory, with sources and links.
The long paragraphs are I am quoting, are the Constitution of Canada, and it's the law of the land. And I am not selectively quoting you. Your first statement made a blanket claim. Not you can argue to eternity, it won't change that your statement was wrong.
Also, as a person who is on a TRV in Canada, can work in any part of Canada, including QC. However, if the PR application is pending, to which an applicant applied as a FSW, then he has to have an intention to settle in Canada, other than QC.
"75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada
and who intend to reside in a province other than the Province of Quebec."
Further, the courts have held, "[t]he assessment of intention,
since it is a highly subjective notion, may take into account all indicia, including past conduct, present circumstances, and future plans, as best as can be ascertained from the available evidence and context." Since OP has stated that his intention to move to QC is to take a temp job.
What you call a smart advice, is devoid of the what law states. Also in current times when getting a job is difficult, asking some to just forgo an opportunity, when the law states that it can be done, doesn't seem to be that smart.
As long as the OP can provide his intention to reside in Canada, other than QC, there is no issue. And there are many federal court cases that have laid the law and the threshold of evidence required.
Law is not about assumptions, should you, could you. It's about definitive answers.
I have also posted a case from the federal law, which details the law and how intention is looked into, as interpreted by the court, not assumptions.
If you would only read.
As always, this is a public forum. Everyone is free to give their opinion, whether it be devoid of what the law states. It is for the OP to do what is best for his application or seek independent legal advise.